io.github.catherine-development/ives-yim

Catherine Ives-Yim: writing and assessments

Read-only search of Catherine Ives-Yim's writing on AI, IoT and the CRA, and scoring of four checks.

1.0.0
Version
remote
Transport
6
Tools

Security review

Review passed

Reviewed 1d ago.

  • tools: 6 tools scanned
  • metadata: scanned

No findings.

Tools (6)

  • list_articles

    Catherine Ives-Yim's published articles (slug, title, standfirst, theme, publication label, address, length), optionally filtered by theme or a word in the title. Free to call; no model involved.

  • list_themes

    The themes the articles are grouped under, with counts.

  • get_article

    The full text of an article or site page by slug, with citation and source labels. About describes stated experience; Services describes the offering; articles describe published views. None is independent verification. Cite the address.

  • search_articles

    Keyword search over the bundled writing and site pages. Accepts questions or keywords, excludes further-reading sections, and returns a best passage per source before additional passages. Includes citation and source labels. Read get_article before making broader claims. No model is involved; this is retrieval, not an answer or independent verification.

  • list_assessments

    The free questionnaire tools on the site and, for one of them, its full question set: modules, questions, answer anchors or options, and the conditions under which a question applies. Use this to put the questions to a user before calling score_assessment.

  • score_assessment

    Runs the same deterministic rules engine the website uses for one of the assessments and returns the headline, module scores, flags and the plan. No model is involved: the result is computed from published rules, exactly as a visitor to the site would get. Answers: scale questions take 0 to 3 (worst to best anchor) or "dk" for don't know; single-choice questions take the option value; multi-select questions take an array of option values, e.g. {"CTX-markets": ["eu", "uk"]}. Unknown question ids or invalid values are rejected with an error listing them. Unanswered questions lower confidence rather than the score, and the result carries an "evidence" field: with no scored questions answered the headline is "Not enough answers", and below half confidence the headline is marked provisional. The result is a diagnostic to guide a conversation, not advice.