io.github.leonidahqadmin-cell/agentflow

AgentFlow

Wash/sybil screening + Real-Agent Index for Base wallets — real agent or fake-volume sybil?

1.0.0
Version
remote
Transport
6
Tools

Security review

Review passed

Reviewed 1h ago.

  • tools: 6 tools scanned
  • metadata: scanned

No findings.

Tools (6)

  • screen_wallet

    Wash/sybil screen for any Base wallet — real autonomous agent or fake-volume sybil? Returns a calibrated sybil_score (0-100), confidence, and the reasons. Use before an agent trusts or pays a counterparty.

  • counterparty_risk

    Counterparty risk score (0-100; LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH/UNKNOWN) for any Base wallet — wash + hub detection + automation score + known-entity labels.

  • real_agent_index

    The Real-Agent Index: what % of 'AI agent' USDC flow on Base is wash/self-dealing vs. genuine one-way payments. The honest benchmark.

  • agent_pulse

    The speedometer: distinct genuine AI agents ACTIVE on Base in the live 24h / 72h window (rises AND falls), vs. the cumulative count.

  • index_stats

    AgentFlow coverage stats: wallets tracked, agents labeled, hubs excluded, authorized x402 payers, transfers in the live window, last indexed block.

  • x402_rail_tape

    The Base EIP-3009 Settlement Tape: daily verifiable FLOOR on gasless x402-style USDC settlement on Base — tx count, volume, wash-suspect share (count + value), median payment, share of value >=$1, and chain coverage %. Methodology-versioned, receipts-backed. NOT total x402 volume — a lower bound with its blind spots disclosed.