NVIDIA NemoClaw CKG

Reviewed Jan 1, 2000.

• tools: 8 tools scanned
• metadata: scanned
• packages: 1 checked

No findings.

Tools (8)

• ask_nemoclaw

  Answer a question about NVIDIA NemoClaw by traversing the knowledge graph. Covers: agent runtimes (OpenClaw/Hermes/Deep Agents), OpenShell platform, inference routing, network policy, security layers, deployment paths, progressive tool disclosure, managed MCP servers, snapshots, shields, FOX Blueprint, Nemotron 3 Ultra ecosystem, and platform support. Args: question: Your question about NemoClaw concepts or architecture.

• query_ckg

  Return the typed subgraph around a NemoClaw concept. Args: concept: Exact or partial concept label (e.g. 'OpenClaw', 'NetworkPolicy', 'L7Proxy'). depth: Traversal hops (1–5, default 3).

• get_prerequisites

  Return the full upstream prerequisite chain for a NemoClaw concept. Useful for understanding what a concept depends on end-to-end. Args: concept: Exact or partial concept label.

• search_concepts

  Fuzzy search for NemoClaw concepts by name or keyword. Args: query: Partial name or keyword (e.g. 'policy', 'inference', 'agent').

• list_domains

  List available domains in this CKG server.

• verify_source

  Return the authoritative source URL and content hash for a NemoClaw concept node. Every node in the CKG was declared from a specific source document. This tool returns the source URL (where the node came from) and the SHA-256 hash of that document's bytes at extraction time. A hash mismatch on re-fetch means either the source has changed (stale edge — re-extract) or the graph was patched without re-fetching (silent edit — investigate). Audit chain: edge answer → graph commit → source_hash → source_url (fetch hint) Verification: curl -s <source_url> | sha256sum # compare output to source_hash Args: concept: Exact or partial concept label (e.g. 'CorporateCA', 'L7Proxy').

• route_query

  Route a NemoClaw question to the optimal model and reasoning approach via graph depth. The CKG graph IS the router. NemoClaw's dependency chains (e.g. OpenShell → L7Proxy → CorporateCA → mTLS) are deep and typed — hop depth is a deterministic complexity signal. No heuristic: the graph decides which model and reasoning approach to use. Routing table: hop_depth 1 → haiku · direct (single concept lookup) hop_depth 2 → sonnet · generic_cot (moderate chain) hop_depth 3+ → opus · sparql_cot (deep chain, structured reasoning required) Args: question: Concept name or natural language question about NemoClaw / OpenShell. Returns: model_tier + reasoning_approach + why + context subgraph to inject before LLM call.

• query_intersect

  Answer a conjunctive query: concepts reachable from EVERY anchor at once (A AND B). query_ckg walks outward from one concept. This intersects the reachable sets of two or more, which is the shape of most real questions — "the component that satisfies A AND applies to B". Neither anchor alone answers it; the answer lives in the overlap. Every branch is an exact set of declared edges, so the intersection is exact. A concept appears only if a declared path reaches it from each anchor. A relation missing from the graph produces an empty result, never a guess. Args: branches: Two or more branches. Either a bare anchor ("TensorRT-LLM"), which takes everything within `depth` hops, or an anchor plus an explicit relation path using '>' ("TensorRT-LLM > REQUIRES > ENABLES"), where each relation replaces the frontier. '*' matches any relation. Mix both forms freely. depth: Hops for bare-anchor branches, 1-5 (default 2). Ignored for explicit paths. direction: