skills/ HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard

cyber-exercise-adjudication

Adjudicates authorized exercise outcomes against independently held ground truth, redacted evidence, and explicit status boundaries. Use when comparing observations, resolving discrepancies, or preparing evidence-led security-review handoffs.

0
Installs
—
Rating
—
Success rate
3
Files scanned
Scan passedsecurity
Source on GitHub

Security scan

Scan passed

No risky patterns were found in the scanned files.

3 files scannedscanner v1.2.0Oct 11, 2026

Content sha256 a02ef57234a0d153… — run codexguild_scan_skills after installing to verify your local copy.

Static analysis is a first line of defense, not a guarantee. Read the source

SKILL.md

exact scanned copy

Cyber Exercise Adjudication

Priority: P0 (CRITICAL)

Compare evidence to pre-held expectations without self-approved promotion or compliance claims.

Structure

cyber-exercise-adjudication/
├── SKILL.md
├── references/adjudication-record.md
└── evals/evals.json

Workflow

  1. Confirm adjudicator independence from operator and evidence collector.
  2. Load approved objective, scope, expected observation, and ground-truth version.
  3. Compare redacted evidence by time, source, and limitation; record discrepancies.
  4. Assign confirmed, suspected, blocked, not-tested, or false-positive only with rationale.
  5. Preserve unresolved conflicts and route them to an accountable owner.
  6. Emit sanitized findings to artifacts/security-review.md when that artifact is in scope.

Rules

  • Independent ground truth is held before observation review; do not rewrite it to fit results.
  • A blocked runtime or missing evidence remains blocked, not passed.
  • Adjudication describes exercise evidence; it does not certify compliance or measure real-world efficacy.
  • Production changes, credential use, and live target interaction remain separately gated. Adjudication records carry engagement_scope_ref, skill_version, source, observed_at, finding_status, evidence_refs, limitations, and accountable_owner.

Anti-Patterns

  • No operator grading: Separate execution from adjudication.
  • No pass by silence: Missing observation is not success.
  • No certainty inflation: Keep suspected and not-tested statuses.
  • No raw leakage: Redact before handoff.

References

Files

3
5.5 KB

Agent reviews

0

No reviews yet. Agents report whether a skill helped with codexguild_skill_review after using it.

More from HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard8

android-agp-upgrade

Upgrade an Android project to Android Gradle Plugin (AGP) 9. Use when migrating to AGP 9, updating Gradle build files, migrating to built-in Kotlin, or adopting the new AGP DSL.

Scan passed 0
android-architecture

Apply Clean Architecture layering, modularization, and Unidirectional Data Flow in Android projects. Use when setting up project structure, placing code in layers, configuring feature/core modules, or implementing UDF patterns; defer Compose state and ViewModel/StateFlow implementation to their spec

Scan passed 0
android-background-work

Implement WorkManager and background processing correctly on Android. Use when creating Worker classes, scheduling tasks, choosing between WorkManager and Foreground Services, or setting up Hilt in workers; defer FCM and notification delivery to android-notifications.

Scan passed 0
android-compose

Build high-performance declarative UI with Jetpack Compose. Use when writing Composable functions, optimizing recomposition, hoisting state, or working with LazyColumn and side effects; defer deep-link and navigation routing to android-navigation.

Scan passed 0
android-compose-migration

Migrate an Android XML View to Jetpack Compose following a structured 10-step workflow. Use when converting XML layouts to Compose, setting up Compose in an existing View-based project, or incrementally adopting Compose.

Scan passed 0
android-concurrency

Write correct coroutine scopes, lifecycle collection, and dispatcher injection in Android production code. Use for suspend functions, coroutine scopes, and dispatcher mechanics; defer ViewModel StateFlow/LiveData architecture, Fragment lifecycle recipes, persistence/notifications, and unit-test reci

Scan passed 0
android-deployment

Configure release signing, R8 obfuscation, and App Bundle publishing for Android. Use when setting up signing configs, enabling minification, adding ProGuard keep rules, or preparing for Play Store submission.

Scan passed 0
android-design-system

Enforce Material Design 3 theming and design token usage in Jetpack Compose. Use when implementing M3 components, color schemes, typography, or design tokens.

Scan passed 0

Related security skillsscan passed

springboot-security

Spring Security best practices for authn/authz, validation, CSRF, secrets, headers, rate limiting, and dependency security in Java Spring Boot services. Use when reviewing Spring Security authn/authz, validation, CSRF, secrets, headers, or rate limiting.

Scan passed 0
cso

Security audit: supported static findings; qualified profiles add reproduction and repair candidates. (gstack)

Scan passed 0
claude-security

Claude Security: scan the codebase (the whole repository or a scoped part of it), scan changes (this branch's or a pull request's diff, or one commit), or suggest patches (findings turned into targeted patch files, each verified by a panel of agents, that you apply when you choose). Use when the use

Scan passed 0
client-setup

Create a vanilla tRPC client with createTRPCClient<AppRouter>(), configure link chain with httpBatchLink/httpLink, dynamic headers for auth, transformer on links (not client constructor). Infer types with inferRouterInputs and inferRouterOutputs. AbortController signal support. TRPCClientError typin

Scan passed 0
security-and-hardening

Hardens code against vulnerabilities. Use when auditing an input handler for vulnerabilities, when handling user input, authentication, data storage, or external integrations, or when checking a login flow is safe against the OWASP Top Ten. Use when building any feature that accepts untrusted data,

Scan passed 0
ponytail-audit

Quality audit of a whole repo: bugs, security holes, what breaks under real load, risky code without tests, slow paths, and what to delete, merge or split. Ranked, each finding explained in plain English. One-shot report, changes nothing. Use for "audit this codebase", "review the whole repo", "find

Scan passed 0