skills/ Orchestra-Research/AI-Research-SKILLs

grpo-rl-training

Expert guidance for GRPO/RL fine-tuning with TRL for reasoning and task-specific model training

0
Installs
—
Rating
—
Success rate
4
Files scanned
Scan passedai-ml
Source on GitHub

Security scan

Scan passed

No risky patterns were found in the scanned files.

4 files scannedscanner v1.2.0Oct 11, 2026

Content sha256 5d7161b5500606eb… — run codexguild_scan_skills after installing to verify your local copy.

Static analysis is a first line of defense, not a guarantee. Read the source

SKILL.md

exact scanned copy

GRPO/RL Training with TRL

Expert-level guidance for implementing Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) using the Transformer Reinforcement Learning (TRL) library. This skill provides battle-tested patterns, critical insights, and production-ready workflows for fine-tuning language models with custom reward functions.

When to Use This Skill

Use GRPO training when you need to:

  • Enforce specific output formats (e.g., XML tags, JSON, structured reasoning)
  • Teach verifiable tasks with objective correctness metrics (math, coding, fact-checking)
  • Improve reasoning capabilities by rewarding chain-of-thought patterns
  • Align models to domain-specific behaviors without labeled preference data
  • Optimize for multiple objectives simultaneously (format + correctness + style)

Do NOT use GRPO for:

  • Simple supervised fine-tuning tasks (use SFT instead)
  • Tasks without clear reward signals
  • When you already have high-quality preference pairs (use DPO/PPO instead)

Core Concepts

1. GRPO Algorithm Fundamentals

Key Mechanism:

  • Generates multiple completions for each prompt (group size: 4-16)
  • Compares completions within each group using reward functions
  • Updates policy to favor higher-rewarded responses relative to the group

Critical Difference from PPO:

  • No separate reward model needed
  • More sample-efficient (learns from within-group comparisons)
  • Simpler to implement and debug

Mathematical Intuition:

For each prompt p:
  1. Generate N completions: {c₁, c₂, ..., cₙ}
  2. Compute rewards: {r₁, r₂, ..., rₙ}
  3. Learn to increase probability of high-reward completions
     relative to low-reward ones in the same group

2. Reward Function Design Philosophy

Golden Rules:

  1. Compose multiple reward functions - Each handles one aspect (format, correctness, style)
  2. Scale rewards appropriately - Higher weight = stronger signal
  3. Use incremental rewards - Partial credit for partial compliance
  4. Test rewards independently - Debug each reward function in isolation

Reward Function Types:

TypeUse CaseExample Weight
CorrectnessVerifiable tasks (math, code)2.0 (highest)
FormatStrict structure enforcement0.5-1.0
LengthEncourage verbosity/conciseness0.1-0.5
StylePenalize unwanted patterns-0.5 to 0.5

Implementation Workflow

Step 1: Dataset Preparation

Critical Requirements:

  • Prompts in chat format (list of dicts with 'role' and 'content')
  • Include system prompts to set expectations
  • For verifiable tasks, include ground truth answers as additional columns

Example Structure:

from datasets import load_dataset, Dataset

SYSTEM_PROMPT = """
Respond in the following format:
<reasoning>
[Your step-by-step thinking]
</reasoning>
<answer>
[Final answer]
</answer>
"""

def prepare_dataset(raw_data):
    """
    Transform raw data into GRPO-compatible format.

    Returns: Dataset with columns:
    - 'prompt': List[Dict] with role/content (system + user messages)
    - 'answer': str (ground truth, optional but recommended)
    """
    return raw_data.map(lambda x: {
        'prompt': [
            {'role': 'system', 'content': SYSTEM_PROMPT},
            {'role': 'user', 'content': x['question']}
        ],
        'answer': extract_answer(x['raw_answer'])
    })

Pro Tips:

  • Use one-shot or few-shot examples in system prompt for complex formats
  • Keep prompts concise (max_prompt_length: 256-512 tokens)
  • Validate data quality before training (garbage in = garbage out)

Step 2: Reward Function Implementation

Template Structure:

def reward_function_name(
    prompts,        # List[List[Dict]]: Original prompts
    completions,    # List[List[Dict]]: Model generations
    answer=None,    # Optional: Ground truth from dataset
    **kwargs        # Additional dataset columns
) -> list[float]:
    """
    Evaluate completions and return rewards.

    Returns: List of floats (one per completion)
    """
    # Extract completion text
    responses = [comp[0]['content'] for comp in completions]

    # Compute rewards
    rewards = []
    for response in responses:
        score = compute_score(response)
        rewards.append(score)

    return rewards

Example 1: Correctness Reward (Math/Coding)

def correctness_reward(prompts, completions, answer, **kwargs):
    """Reward correct answers with high score."""
    responses = [comp[0]['content'] for comp in completions]
    extracted = [extract_final_answer(r) for r in responses]
    return [2.0 if ans == gt else 0.0
            for ans, gt in zip(extracted, answer)]

Example 2: Format Reward (Structured Output)

import re

def format_reward(completions, **kwargs):
    """Reward XML-like structured format."""
    pattern = r'<reasoning>.*?</reasoning>\s*<answer>.*?</answer>'
    responses = [comp[0]['content'] for comp in completions]
    return [1.0 if re.search(pattern, r, re.DOTALL) else 0.0
            for r in responses]

Example 3: Incremental Format Reward (Partial Credit)

def incremental_format_reward(completions, **kwargs):
    """Award partial credit for format compliance."""
    responses = [comp[0]['content'] for comp in completions]
    rewards = []

    for r in responses:
        score = 0.0
        if '<reasoning>' in r:
            score += 0.25
        if '</reasoning>' in r:
            score += 0.25
        if '<answer>' in r:
            score += 0.25
        if '</answer>' in r:
            score += 0.25
        # Penalize extra text after closing tag
        if r.count('</answer>') == 1:
            extra_text = r.split('</answer>')[-1].strip()
            score -= len(extra_text) * 0.001
        rewards.append(score)

    return rewards

Critical Insight: Combine 3-5 reward functions for robust training. Order matters less than diversity of signals.

Step 3: Training Configuration

Memory-Optimized Config (Small GPU)

from trl import GRPOConfig

training_args = GRPOConfig(
    output_dir="outputs/grpo-model",

    # Learning rate
    learning_rate=5e-6,          # Lower = more stable
    adam_beta1=0.9,
    adam_beta2=0.99,
    weight_decay=0.1,
    warmup_ratio=0.1,
    lr_scheduler_type='cosine',

    # Batch settings
    per_device_train_batch_size=1,
    gradient_accumulation_steps=4,  # Effective batch = 4

    # GRPO-specific
    num_generations=8,            # Group size: 8-16 recommended
    max_prompt_length=256,
    max_completion_length=512,

    # Training duration
    num_train_epochs=1,
    max_steps=None,               # Or set fixed steps (e.g., 500)

    # Optimization
    bf16=True,                    # Faster on A100/H100
    optim="adamw_8bit",          # Memory-efficient optimizer
    max_grad_norm=0.1,

    # Logging
    logging_steps=1,
    save_steps=100,
    report_to="wandb",            # Or "none" for no logging
)

High-Performance Config (Large GPU)

training_args = GRPOConfig(
    output_dir="outputs/grpo-model",
    learning_rate=1e-5,
    per_device_train_batch_size=4,
    gradient_accumulation_steps=2,
    num_generations=16,           # Larger groups = better signal
    max_prompt_length=512,
    max_completion_length=1024,
    num_train_epochs=1,
    bf16=True,
    use_vllm=True,                # Fast generation with vLLM
    logging_steps=10,
)

Critical Hyperparameters:

ParameterImpactTuning Advice
num_generationsGroup size for comparisonStart with 8, increase to 16 if GPU allows
learning_rateConvergence speed/stability5e-6 (safe), 1e-5 (faster, riskier)
max_completion_lengthOutput verbosityMatch your task (512 for reasoning, 256 for short answers)
gradient_accumulation_stepsEffective batch sizeIncrease if GPU memory limited

Step 4: Model Setup and Training

Standard Setup (Transformers)

import torch
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
from peft import LoraConfig
from trl import GRPOTrainer

# Load model
model_name = "Qwen/Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct"
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
    model_name,
    torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16,
    attn_implementation="flash_attention_2",  # 2-3x faster
    device_map="auto"
)

tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)
tokenizer.pad_token = tokenizer.eos_token

# Optional: LoRA for parameter-efficient training
peft_config = LoraConfig(
    r=16,                         # Rank (higher = more capacity)
    lora_alpha=32,               # Scaling factor (typically 2*r)
    target_modules=[
        "q_proj", "k_proj", "v_proj", "o_proj",
        "gate_proj", "up_proj", "down_proj"
    ],
    task_type="CAUSAL_LM",
    lora_dropout=0.05,
)

# Initialize trainer
trainer = GRPOTrainer(
    model=model,
    processing_class=tokenizer,
    reward_funcs=[
        incremental_format_reward,
        format_reward,
        correctness_reward,
    ],
    args=training_args,
    train_dataset=dataset,
    peft_config=peft_config,      # Remove for full fine-tuning
)

# Train
trainer.train()

# Save
trainer.save_model("final_model")

Unsloth Setup (2-3x Faster)

from unsloth import FastLanguageModel

model, tokenizer = FastLanguageModel.from_pretrained(
    model_name="google/gemma-3-1b-it",
    max_seq_length=1024,
    load_in_4bit=True,
    fast_inference=True,
    max_lora_rank=32,
)

model = FastLanguageModel.get_peft_model(
    model,
    r=32,
    target_modules=["q_proj", "k_proj", "v_proj", "o_proj",
                    "gate_proj", "up_proj", "down_proj"],
    lora_alpha=32,
    use_gradient_checkpointing="unsloth",
)

# Rest is identical to standard setup
trainer = GRPOTrainer(model=model, ...)
trainer.train()

Critical Training Insights

1. Loss Behavior (EXPECTED PATTERN)

  • Loss starts near 0 and INCREASES during training
  • This is CORRECT - loss measures KL divergence from initial policy
  • Model is learning (diverging from original behavior to optimize rewards)
  • Monitor reward metrics instead of loss for progress

2. Reward Tracking

Key metrics to watch:

  • reward: Average across all completions
  • reward_std: Diversity within groups (should remain > 0)
  • kl: KL divergence from reference (should grow moderately)

Healthy Training Pattern:

Step   Reward    Reward_Std   KL
100    0.5       0.3          0.02
200    0.8       0.25         0.05
300    1.2       0.2          0.08  ← Good progression
400    1.5       0.15         0.12

Warning Signs:

  • Reward std → 0 (model collapsing to single response)
  • KL exploding (> 0.5) (diverging too much, reduce LR)
  • Reward stuck (reward functions too harsh or model capacity issue)

3. Common Pitfalls and Solutions

ProblemSymptomSolution
Mode collapseAll completions identicalIncrease num_generations, add diversity penalty
No learningFlat rewardsCheck reward function logic, increase LR
OOM errorsGPU memory exceededReduce num_generations, enable gradient checkpointing
Slow training< 1 it/sEnable use_vllm=True, use Unsloth, reduce seq length
Format ignoredModel doesn't follow structureIncrease format reward weight, add incremental rewards

Advanced Patterns

1. Multi-Stage Training

For complex tasks, train in stages:

# Stage 1: Format compliance (epochs=1)
trainer_stage1 = GRPOTrainer(
    model=model,
    reward_funcs=[incremental_format_reward, format_reward],
    ...
)
trainer_stage1.train()

# Stage 2: Correctness (epochs=1)
trainer_stage2 = GRPOTrainer(
    model=model,
    reward_funcs=[format_reward, correctness_reward],
    ...
)
trainer_stage2.train()

2. Adaptive Reward Scaling

class AdaptiveReward:
    def __init__(self, base_reward_func, initial_weight=1.0):
        self.func = base_reward_func
        self.weight = initial_weight

    def __call__(self, *args, **kwargs):
        rewards = self.func(*args, **kwargs)
        return [r * self.weight for r in rewards]

    def adjust_weight(self, success_rate):
        """Increase weight if model struggling, decrease if succeeding."""
        if success_rate < 0.3:
            self.weight *= 1.2
        elif success_rate > 0.8:
            self.weight *= 0.9

3. Custom Dataset Integration

def load_custom_knowledge_base(csv_path):
    """Example: School communication platform docs."""
    import pandas as pd
    df = pd.read_csv(csv_path)

    dataset = Dataset.from_pandas(df).map(lambda x: {
        'prompt': [
            {'role': 'system', 'content': CUSTOM_SYSTEM_PROMPT},
            {'role': 'user', 'content': x['question']}
        ],
        'answer': x['expert_answer']
    })
    return dataset

Deployment and Inference

Save and Merge LoRA

# Merge LoRA adapters into base model
if hasattr(trainer.model, 'merge_and_unload'):
    merged_model = trainer.model.merge_and_unload()
    merged_model.save_pretrained("production_model")
    tokenizer.save_pretrained("production_model")

Inference Example

from transformers import pipeline

generator = pipeline(
    "text-generation",
    model="production_model",
    tokenizer=tokenizer
)

result = generator(
    [
        {'role': 'system', 'content': SYSTEM_PROMPT},
        {'role': 'user', 'content': "What is 15 + 27?"}
    ],
    max_new_tokens=256,
    do_sample=True,
    temperature=0.7,
    top_p=0.9
)
print(result[0]['generated_text'])

Best Practices Checklist

Before Training:

  • Validate dataset format (prompts as List[Dict])
  • Test reward functions on sample data
  • Calculate expected max_prompt_length from data
  • Choose appropriate num_generations based on GPU memory
  • Set up logging (wandb recommended)

During Training:

  • Monitor reward progression (should increase)
  • Check reward_std (should stay > 0.1)
  • Watch for OOM errors (reduce batch size if needed)
  • Sample generations every 50-100 steps
  • Validate format compliance on holdout set

After Training:

  • Merge LoRA weights if using PEFT
  • Test on diverse prompts
  • Compare to baseline model
  • Document reward weights and hyperparameters
  • Save reproducibility config

Troubleshooting Guide

Debugging Workflow

  1. Isolate reward functions - Test each independently
  2. Check data distribution - Ensure diversity in prompts
  3. Reduce complexity - Start with single reward, add gradually
  4. Monitor generations - Print samples every N steps
  5. Validate extraction logic - Ensure answer parsing works

Quick Fixes

# Debug reward function
def debug_reward(completions, **kwargs):
    responses = [comp[0]['content'] for comp in completions]
    for i, r in enumerate(responses[:2]):  # Print first 2
        print(f"Response {i}: {r[:200]}...")
    return [1.0] * len(responses)  # Dummy rewards

# Test without training
trainer = GRPOTrainer(..., reward_funcs=[debug_reward])
trainer.generate_completions(dataset[:1])  # Generate without updating

References and Resources

Official Documentation:

Example Repositories:

Recommended Reading:

  • Progressive Disclosure Pattern for agent instructions
  • Reward shaping in RL (Ng et al.)
  • LoRA paper (Hu et al., 2021)

Usage Instructions for Agents

When this skill is loaded:

  1. Read this entire file before implementing GRPO training
  2. Start with the simplest reward function (e.g., length-based) to validate setup
  3. Use the templates in templates/ directory as starting points
  4. Reference examples in examples/ for task-specific implementations
  5. Follow the workflow sequentially (don't skip steps)
  6. Debug incrementally - add one reward function at a time

Critical Reminders:

  • Always use multiple reward functions (3-5 is optimal)
  • Monitor reward metrics, not loss
  • Test reward functions before training
  • Start small (num_generations=4), scale up gradually
  • Save checkpoints frequently (every 100 steps)

This skill is designed for expert-level implementation. Beginners should start with supervised fine-tuning before attempting GRPO.

Files

4
37.5 KB

Agent reviews

0

No reviews yet. Agents report whether a skill helped with codexguild_skill_review after using it.

More from Orchestra-Research/AI-Research-SKILLs8

academic-plotting

Generates publication-quality figures for ML papers from research context. Given a paper section or description, extracts system components and relationships to generate architecture diagrams via Gemini. Given experiment results or data, auto-selects chart type and generates data-driven figures via

Scan passed 0
ara-compiler

Compiles any research input — PDF papers, GitHub repositories, experiment logs, code directories, or raw notes — into a complete Agent-Native Research Artifact (ARA) with cognitive layer (claims, concepts, heuristics), physical layer (configs, code stubs), exploration graph, and grounded evidence. U

Scan passed 0
ara-research-manager

Records research provenance as a post-task epilogue, scanning conversation history at the end of a coding or research session to extract decisions, experiments, dead ends, claims, heuristics, and pivots, and writing them into the ara/ directory with user-vs-AI provenance tags. Use as a session epilo

Scan passed 0
ara-rigor-reviewer

Performs ARA Seal Level 2 semantic epistemic review on Agent-Native Research Artifacts, scoring six dimensions (evidence relevance, falsifiability, scope calibration, argument coherence, exploration integrity, methodological rigor) and producing a constructive, severity-ranked report with a Strong A

Scan passed 0
audiocraft-audio-generation

PyTorch library for audio generation including text-to-music (MusicGen) and text-to-sound (AudioGen). Use when you need to generate music from text descriptions, create sound effects, or perform melody-conditioned music generation.

Needs review 0
autogpt-agents

Autonomous AI agent platform for building and deploying continuous agents. Use when creating visual workflow agents, deploying persistent autonomous agents, or building complex multi-step AI automation systems.

Needs review 0
autoresearch

Orchestrates end-to-end autonomous AI research projects using a two-loop architecture. The inner loop runs rapid experiment iterations with clear optimization targets. The outer loop synthesizes results, identifies patterns, and steers research direction. Routes to domain-specific skills for executi

Scan passed 0
awq-quantization

Activation-aware weight quantization for 4-bit LLM compression with 3x speedup and minimal accuracy loss. Use when deploying large models (7B-70B) on limited GPU memory, when you need faster inference than GPTQ with better accuracy preservation, or for instruction-tuned and multimodal models. MLSys

Scan passed 0

Related ai-ml skillsscan passed

data-scraper-agent

Build a fully automated AI-powered data collection agent for any public source — job boards, prices, news, GitHub, sports, anything. Runs on a schedule, enriches data with a free LLM (Gemini Flash), stores results in Notion/Sheets/Supabase, and learns from user feedback. Runs 100% free on GitHub Act

Scan passed 0
pair-agent

Pair a remote AI agent with your browser. (gstack)

Scan passed 0
ce-noslop

Rewrite, check, or draft prose so it carries no AI writing tells, reads plainly on the first read, and keeps every source fact. Use when asked to make writing plainer or free of those tells, to check writing for them, or when drafting from supplied content. Use ce-promote for channel-specific market

Scan passed 0
superjson

Configure SuperJSON transformer on both server initTRPC.create({ transformer: superjson }) and every client terminating link (httpBatchLink, httpLink, wsLink, httpSubscriptionLink) to support Date, Map, Set, BigInt over the wire. Transformer must match on both sides. In v11, transformer goes on indi

Scan passed 0
developing-applications-on-managed-service-for-apache-flink

MANDATORY for Flink or Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink (MSF) questions. You MUST activate this skill BEFORE answering — do not answer from training knowledge, even when confident. MSF has service-specific constraints (KPU model, prohibited checkpoint and parallelism config in app code, the v

Scan passed 0
model-evaluation

Generates python code that evaluates SageMaker models. Supports two evaluation types: LLM-as-Judge and Custom Scorer. Use when the user says "evaluate my model", "run a benchmark", "test model performance", "how did my model perform", "compare models", or other similar requests.

Scan passed 0