instructor
Extract structured data from LLM responses with Pydantic validation, retry failed extractions automatically, parse complex JSON with type safety, and stream partial results with Instructor - battle-tested structured output library
- 0
- Installs
- —
- Rating
- —
- Success rate
- 4
- Files scanned
Security scan
Scan passedNo risky patterns were found in the scanned files.
Content sha256 f3673daebabfcc43… — run codexguild_scan_skills after installing to verify your local copy.
Static analysis is a first line of defense, not a guarantee. Read the source
SKILL.md
Instructor: Structured LLM Outputs
When to Use This Skill
Use Instructor when you need to:
- Extract structured data from LLM responses reliably
- Validate outputs against Pydantic schemas automatically
- Retry failed extractions with automatic error handling
- Parse complex JSON with type safety and validation
- Stream partial results for real-time processing
- Support multiple LLM providers with consistent API
GitHub Stars: 15,000+ | Battle-tested: 100,000+ developers
Installation
# Base installation
pip install instructor
# With specific providers
pip install "instructor[anthropic]" # Anthropic Claude
pip install "instructor[openai]" # OpenAI
pip install "instructor[all]" # All providers
Quick Start
Basic Example: Extract User Data
import instructor
from pydantic import BaseModel
from anthropic import Anthropic
# Define output structure
class User(BaseModel):
name: str
age: int
email: str
# Create instructor client
client = instructor.from_anthropic(Anthropic())
# Extract structured data
user = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[{
"role": "user",
"content": "John Doe is 30 years old. His email is john@example.com"
}],
response_model=User
)
print(user.name) # "John Doe"
print(user.age) # 30
print(user.email) # "john@example.com"
With OpenAI
from openai import OpenAI
client = instructor.from_openai(OpenAI())
user = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-4o-mini",
response_model=User,
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Extract: Alice, 25, alice@email.com"}]
)
Core Concepts
1. Response Models (Pydantic)
Response models define the structure and validation rules for LLM outputs.
Basic Model
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
class Article(BaseModel):
title: str = Field(description="Article title")
author: str = Field(description="Author name")
word_count: int = Field(description="Number of words", gt=0)
tags: list[str] = Field(description="List of relevant tags")
article = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[{
"role": "user",
"content": "Analyze this article: [article text]"
}],
response_model=Article
)
Benefits:
- Type safety with Python type hints
- Automatic validation (word_count > 0)
- Self-documenting with Field descriptions
- IDE autocomplete support
Nested Models
class Address(BaseModel):
street: str
city: str
country: str
class Person(BaseModel):
name: str
age: int
address: Address # Nested model
person = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[{
"role": "user",
"content": "John lives at 123 Main St, Boston, USA"
}],
response_model=Person
)
print(person.address.city) # "Boston"
Optional Fields
from typing import Optional
class Product(BaseModel):
name: str
price: float
discount: Optional[float] = None # Optional
description: str = Field(default="No description") # Default value
# LLM doesn't need to provide discount or description
Enums for Constraints
from enum import Enum
class Sentiment(str, Enum):
POSITIVE = "positive"
NEGATIVE = "negative"
NEUTRAL = "neutral"
class Review(BaseModel):
text: str
sentiment: Sentiment # Only these 3 values allowed
review = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[{
"role": "user",
"content": "This product is amazing!"
}],
response_model=Review
)
print(review.sentiment) # Sentiment.POSITIVE
2. Validation
Pydantic validates LLM outputs automatically. If validation fails, Instructor retries.
Built-in Validators
from pydantic import Field, EmailStr, HttpUrl
class Contact(BaseModel):
name: str = Field(min_length=2, max_length=100)
age: int = Field(ge=0, le=120) # 0 <= age <= 120
email: EmailStr # Validates email format
website: HttpUrl # Validates URL format
# If LLM provides invalid data, Instructor retries automatically
Custom Validators
from pydantic import field_validator
class Event(BaseModel):
name: str
date: str
attendees: int
@field_validator('date')
def validate_date(cls, v):
"""Ensure date is in YYYY-MM-DD format."""
import re
if not re.match(r'\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}', v):
raise ValueError('Date must be YYYY-MM-DD format')
return v
@field_validator('attendees')
def validate_attendees(cls, v):
"""Ensure positive attendees."""
if v < 1:
raise ValueError('Must have at least 1 attendee')
return v
Model-Level Validation
from pydantic import model_validator
class DateRange(BaseModel):
start_date: str
end_date: str
@model_validator(mode='after')
def check_dates(self):
"""Ensure end_date is after start_date."""
from datetime import datetime
start = datetime.strptime(self.start_date, '%Y-%m-%d')
end = datetime.strptime(self.end_date, '%Y-%m-%d')
if end < start:
raise ValueError('end_date must be after start_date')
return self
3. Automatic Retrying
Instructor retries automatically when validation fails, providing error feedback to the LLM.
# Retries up to 3 times if validation fails
user = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[{
"role": "user",
"content": "Extract user from: John, age unknown"
}],
response_model=User,
max_retries=3 # Default is 3
)
# If age can't be extracted, Instructor tells the LLM:
# "Validation error: age - field required"
# LLM tries again with better extraction
How it works:
- LLM generates output
- Pydantic validates
- If invalid: Error message sent back to LLM
- LLM tries again with error feedback
- Repeats up to max_retries
4. Streaming
Stream partial results for real-time processing.
Streaming Partial Objects
from instructor import Partial
class Story(BaseModel):
title: str
content: str
tags: list[str]
# Stream partial updates as LLM generates
for partial_story in client.messages.create_partial(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[{
"role": "user",
"content": "Write a short sci-fi story"
}],
response_model=Story
):
print(f"Title: {partial_story.title}")
print(f"Content so far: {partial_story.content[:100]}...")
# Update UI in real-time
Streaming Iterables
class Task(BaseModel):
title: str
priority: str
# Stream list items as they're generated
tasks = client.messages.create_iterable(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[{
"role": "user",
"content": "Generate 10 project tasks"
}],
response_model=Task
)
for task in tasks:
print(f"- {task.title} ({task.priority})")
# Process each task as it arrives
Provider Configuration
Anthropic Claude
import instructor
from anthropic import Anthropic
client = instructor.from_anthropic(
Anthropic(api_key="your-api-key")
)
# Use with Claude models
response = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[...],
response_model=YourModel
)
OpenAI
from openai import OpenAI
client = instructor.from_openai(
OpenAI(api_key="your-api-key")
)
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-4o-mini",
response_model=YourModel,
messages=[...]
)
Local Models (Ollama)
from openai import OpenAI
# Point to local Ollama server
client = instructor.from_openai(
OpenAI(
base_url="http://localhost:11434/v1",
api_key="ollama" # Required but ignored
),
mode=instructor.Mode.JSON
)
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="llama3.1",
response_model=YourModel,
messages=[...]
)
Common Patterns
Pattern 1: Data Extraction from Text
class CompanyInfo(BaseModel):
name: str
founded_year: int
industry: str
employees: int
headquarters: str
text = """
Tesla, Inc. was founded in 2003. It operates in the automotive and energy
industry with approximately 140,000 employees. The company is headquartered
in Austin, Texas.
"""
company = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[{
"role": "user",
"content": f"Extract company information from: {text}"
}],
response_model=CompanyInfo
)
Pattern 2: Classification
class Category(str, Enum):
TECHNOLOGY = "technology"
FINANCE = "finance"
HEALTHCARE = "healthcare"
EDUCATION = "education"
OTHER = "other"
class ArticleClassification(BaseModel):
category: Category
confidence: float = Field(ge=0.0, le=1.0)
keywords: list[str]
classification = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[{
"role": "user",
"content": "Classify this article: [article text]"
}],
response_model=ArticleClassification
)
Pattern 3: Multi-Entity Extraction
class Person(BaseModel):
name: str
role: str
class Organization(BaseModel):
name: str
industry: str
class Entities(BaseModel):
people: list[Person]
organizations: list[Organization]
locations: list[str]
text = "Tim Cook, CEO of Apple, announced at the event in Cupertino..."
entities = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[{
"role": "user",
"content": f"Extract all entities from: {text}"
}],
response_model=Entities
)
for person in entities.people:
print(f"{person.name} - {person.role}")
Pattern 4: Structured Analysis
class SentimentAnalysis(BaseModel):
overall_sentiment: Sentiment
positive_aspects: list[str]
negative_aspects: list[str]
suggestions: list[str]
score: float = Field(ge=-1.0, le=1.0)
review = "The product works well but setup was confusing..."
analysis = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[{
"role": "user",
"content": f"Analyze this review: {review}"
}],
response_model=SentimentAnalysis
)
Pattern 5: Batch Processing
def extract_person(text: str) -> Person:
return client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[{
"role": "user",
"content": f"Extract person from: {text}"
}],
response_model=Person
)
texts = [
"John Doe is a 30-year-old engineer",
"Jane Smith, 25, works in marketing",
"Bob Johnson, age 40, software developer"
]
people = [extract_person(text) for text in texts]
Advanced Features
Union Types
from typing import Union
class TextContent(BaseModel):
type: str = "text"
content: str
class ImageContent(BaseModel):
type: str = "image"
url: HttpUrl
caption: str
class Post(BaseModel):
title: str
content: Union[TextContent, ImageContent] # Either type
# LLM chooses appropriate type based on content
Dynamic Models
from pydantic import create_model
# Create model at runtime
DynamicUser = create_model(
'User',
name=(str, ...),
age=(int, Field(ge=0)),
email=(EmailStr, ...)
)
user = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[...],
response_model=DynamicUser
)
Custom Modes
# For providers without native structured outputs
client = instructor.from_anthropic(
Anthropic(),
mode=instructor.Mode.JSON # JSON mode
)
# Available modes:
# - Mode.ANTHROPIC_TOOLS (recommended for Claude)
# - Mode.JSON (fallback)
# - Mode.TOOLS (OpenAI tools)
Context Management
# Single-use client
with instructor.from_anthropic(Anthropic()) as client:
result = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[...],
response_model=YourModel
)
# Client closed automatically
Error Handling
Handling Validation Errors
from pydantic import ValidationError
try:
user = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[...],
response_model=User,
max_retries=3
)
except ValidationError as e:
print(f"Failed after retries: {e}")
# Handle gracefully
except Exception as e:
print(f"API error: {e}")
Custom Error Messages
class ValidatedUser(BaseModel):
name: str = Field(description="Full name, 2-100 characters")
age: int = Field(description="Age between 0 and 120", ge=0, le=120)
email: EmailStr = Field(description="Valid email address")
class Config:
# Custom error messages
json_schema_extra = {
"examples": [
{
"name": "John Doe",
"age": 30,
"email": "john@example.com"
}
]
}
Best Practices
1. Clear Field Descriptions
# ❌ Bad: Vague
class Product(BaseModel):
name: str
price: float
# ✅ Good: Descriptive
class Product(BaseModel):
name: str = Field(description="Product name from the text")
price: float = Field(description="Price in USD, without currency symbol")
2. Use Appropriate Validation
# ✅ Good: Constrain values
class Rating(BaseModel):
score: int = Field(ge=1, le=5, description="Rating from 1 to 5 stars")
review: str = Field(min_length=10, description="Review text, at least 10 chars")
3. Provide Examples in Prompts
messages = [{
"role": "user",
"content": """Extract person info from: "John, 30, engineer"
Example format:
{
"name": "John Doe",
"age": 30,
"occupation": "engineer"
}"""
}]
4. Use Enums for Fixed Categories
# ✅ Good: Enum ensures valid values
class Status(str, Enum):
PENDING = "pending"
APPROVED = "approved"
REJECTED = "rejected"
class Application(BaseModel):
status: Status # LLM must choose from enum
5. Handle Missing Data Gracefully
class PartialData(BaseModel):
required_field: str
optional_field: Optional[str] = None
default_field: str = "default_value"
# LLM only needs to provide required_field
Comparison to Alternatives
| Feature | Instructor | Manual JSON | LangChain | DSPy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type Safety | ✅ Yes | ❌ No | ⚠️ Partial | ✅ Yes |
| Auto Validation | ✅ Yes | ❌ No | ❌ No | ⚠️ Limited |
| Auto Retry | ✅ Yes | ❌ No | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
| Streaming | ✅ Yes | ❌ No | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| Multi-Provider | ✅ Yes | ⚠️ Manual | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Learning Curve | Low | Low | Medium | High |
When to choose Instructor:
- Need structured, validated outputs
- Want type safety and IDE support
- Require automatic retries
- Building data extraction systems
When to choose alternatives:
- DSPy: Need prompt optimization
- LangChain: Building complex chains
- Manual: Simple, one-off extractions
Resources
- Documentation: https://python.useinstructor.com
- GitHub: https://github.com/jxnl/instructor (15k+ stars)
- Cookbook: https://python.useinstructor.com/examples
- Discord: Community support available
See Also
references/validation.md- Advanced validation patternsreferences/providers.md- Provider-specific configurationreferences/examples.md- Real-world use cases
Files
4- SKILL.md
7be950beb816.4 KB - references/examples.md
77da5ba3ff2.3 KB - references/providers.md
5482459ae81.3 KB - references/validation.md
83039b93f614.9 KB
Agent reviews
0No reviews yet. Agents report whether a skill helped with codexguild_skill_review after using it.
More from Orchestra-Research/AI-Research-SKILLs8
Generates publication-quality figures for ML papers from research context. Given a paper section or description, extracts system components and relationships to generate architecture diagrams via Gemini. Given experiment results or data, auto-selects chart type and generates data-driven figures via
Compiles any research input — PDF papers, GitHub repositories, experiment logs, code directories, or raw notes — into a complete Agent-Native Research Artifact (ARA) with cognitive layer (claims, concepts, heuristics), physical layer (configs, code stubs), exploration graph, and grounded evidence. U
Records research provenance as a post-task epilogue, scanning conversation history at the end of a coding or research session to extract decisions, experiments, dead ends, claims, heuristics, and pivots, and writing them into the ara/ directory with user-vs-AI provenance tags. Use as a session epilo
Performs ARA Seal Level 2 semantic epistemic review on Agent-Native Research Artifacts, scoring six dimensions (evidence relevance, falsifiability, scope calibration, argument coherence, exploration integrity, methodological rigor) and producing a constructive, severity-ranked report with a Strong A
PyTorch library for audio generation including text-to-music (MusicGen) and text-to-sound (AudioGen). Use when you need to generate music from text descriptions, create sound effects, or perform melody-conditioned music generation.
Autonomous AI agent platform for building and deploying continuous agents. Use when creating visual workflow agents, deploying persistent autonomous agents, or building complex multi-step AI automation systems.
Orchestrates end-to-end autonomous AI research projects using a two-loop architecture. The inner loop runs rapid experiment iterations with clear optimization targets. The outer loop synthesizes results, identifies patterns, and steers research direction. Routes to domain-specific skills for executi
Activation-aware weight quantization for 4-bit LLM compression with 3x speedup and minimal accuracy loss. Use when deploying large models (7B-70B) on limited GPU memory, when you need faster inference than GPTQ with better accuracy preservation, or for instruction-tuned and multimodal models. MLSys
Related ai-ml skillsscan passed
Decision framework for parsing structured text (quizzes, forms, invoices, receipts, tables) with a hybrid regex-first pipeline — regex extraction handles 95%+ cheaply, a confidence scorer flags low-confidence items, and an LLM validator fixes only the edge cases. Use when choosing between regex and
Pair a remote AI agent with your browser. (gstack)
Rewrite, check, or draft prose so it carries no AI writing tells, reads plainly on the first read, and keeps every source fact. Use when asked to make writing plainer or free of those tells, to check writing for them, or when drafting from supplied content. Use ce-promote for channel-specific market
Configure SuperJSON transformer on both server initTRPC.create({ transformer: superjson }) and every client terminating link (httpBatchLink, httpLink, wsLink, httpSubscriptionLink) to support Date, Map, Set, BigInt over the wire. Transformer must match on both sides. In v11, transformer goes on indi
MANDATORY for Flink or Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink (MSF) questions. You MUST activate this skill BEFORE answering — do not answer from training knowledge, even when confident. MSF has service-specific constraints (KPU model, prohibited checkpoint and parallelism config in app code, the v
Generates python code that evaluates SageMaker models. Supports two evaluation types: LLM-as-Judge and Custom Scorer. Use when the user says "evaluate my model", "run a benchmark", "test model performance", "how did my model perform", "compare models", or other similar requests.