skills/ affaan-m/everything-claude-code

accessibility

Design, implement, and audit accessible UI to WCAG 2.2 Level AA across Web, iOS, and Android — semantic ARIA roles and labels, accessibility traits and hints, focus management, contrast, target size, and screen-reader support. Use when building or auditing UI for accessibility compliance, keyboard n

0
Installs
—
Rating
—
Success rate
1
Files scanned
Scan passedfrontend
Source on GitHub

Security scan

Scan passed

No risky patterns were found in the scanned files.

1 files scannedscanner v1.2.0Oct 11, 2026

Content sha256 40c0526b670e8581… — run codexguild_scan_skills after installing to verify your local copy.

Static analysis is a first line of defense, not a guarantee. Read the source

SKILL.md

exact scanned copy

Accessibility (WCAG 2.2)

This skill ensures that digital interfaces are Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, and Robust (POUR) for all users, including those using screen readers, switch controls, or keyboard navigation. It focuses on the technical implementation of WCAG 2.2 success criteria.

When to Use

  • Defining UI component specifications for Web, iOS, or Android.
  • Auditing existing code for accessibility barriers or compliance gaps.
  • Implementing new WCAG 2.2 standards like Target Size (Minimum) and Focus Appearance.
  • Mapping high-level design requirements to technical attributes (ARIA roles, traits, hints).

Core Concepts

  • POUR Principles: The foundation of WCAG (Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust).
  • Semantic Mapping: Using native elements over generic containers to provide built-in accessibility.
  • Accessibility Tree: The representation of the UI that assistive technologies actually "read."
  • Focus Management: Controlling the order and visibility of the keyboard/screen reader cursor.
  • Labeling & Hints: Providing context through aria-label, accessibilityLabel, and contentDescription.

How It Works

Step 1: Identify the Component Role

Determine the functional purpose (e.g., Is this a button, a link, or a tab?). Use the most semantic native element available before resorting to custom roles.

Step 2: Define Perceivable Attributes

  • Ensure text contrast meets 4.5:1 (normal) or 3:1 (large/UI).
  • Add text alternatives for non-text content (images, icons).
  • Implement responsive reflow (up to 400% zoom without loss of function).

Step 3: Implement Operable Controls

  • Ensure a minimum 24x24 CSS pixel target size (WCAG 2.2 SC 2.5.8).
  • Verify all interactive elements are reachable via keyboard and have a visible focus indicator (SC 2.4.11).
  • Provide single-pointer alternatives for dragging movements.

Step 4: Ensure Understandable Logic

  • Use consistent navigation patterns.
  • Provide descriptive error messages and suggestions for correction (SC 3.3.3).
  • Implement "Redundant Entry" (SC 3.3.7) to prevent asking for the same data twice.

Step 5: Verify Robust Compatibility

  • Use correct Name, Role, Value patterns.
  • Implement aria-live or live regions for dynamic status updates.

Accessibility Architecture Diagram

flowchart TD
  UI["UI Component"] --> Platform{Platform?}
  Platform -->|Web| ARIA["WAI-ARIA + HTML5"]
  Platform -->|iOS| SwiftUI["Accessibility Traits + Labels"]
  Platform -->|Android| Compose["Semantics + ContentDesc"]

  ARIA --> AT["Assistive Technology (Screen Readers, Switches)"]
  SwiftUI --> AT
  Compose --> AT

Cross-Platform Mapping

FeatureWeb (HTML/ARIA)iOS (SwiftUI)Android (Compose)
Primary Labelaria-label / <label>.accessibilityLabel()contentDescription
Secondary Hintaria-describedby.accessibilityHint()Modifier.semantics { stateDescription = ... }
Action Rolerole="button".accessibilityAddTraits(.isButton)Modifier.semantics { role = Role.Button }
Live Updatesaria-live="polite".accessibilityLiveRegion(.polite)Modifier.semantics { liveRegion = LiveRegionMode.Polite }

Examples

Web: Accessible Search

<form role="search">
  <label for="search-input" class="sr-only">Search products</label>
  <input type="search" id="search-input" placeholder="Search..." />
  <button type="submit" aria-label="Submit Search">
    <svg aria-hidden="true">...</svg>
  </button>
</form>

iOS: Accessible Action Button

Button(action: deleteItem) {
    Image(systemName: "trash")
}
.accessibilityLabel("Delete item")
.accessibilityHint("Permanently removes this item from your list")
.accessibilityAddTraits(.isButton)

Android: Accessible Toggle

Switch(
    checked = isEnabled,
    onCheckedChange = { onToggle() },
    modifier = Modifier.semantics {
        contentDescription = "Enable notifications"
    }
)

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

  • Div-Buttons: Using a <div> or <span> for a click event without adding a role and keyboard support.
  • Color-Only Meaning: Indicating an error or status only with a color change (e.g., turning a border red).
  • Uncontained Modal Focus: Modals that don't trap focus, allowing keyboard users to navigate background content while the modal is open. Focus must be contained and escapable via the Escape key or an explicit close button (WCAG SC 2.1.2).
  • Redundant Alt Text: Using "Image of..." or "Picture of..." in alt text (screen readers already announce the role "Image").

Best Practices Checklist

  • Interactive elements meet the 24x24px (Web) or 44x44pt (Native) target size.
  • Focus indicators are clearly visible and high-contrast.
  • Modals contain focus while open, and release it cleanly on close (Escape key or close button).
  • Dropdowns and menus restore focus to the trigger element on close.
  • Forms provide text-based error suggestions.
  • All icon-only buttons have a descriptive text label.
  • Content reflows properly when text is scaled.

References

Related Skills

  • frontend-patterns
  • design-system
  • liquid-glass-design
  • swiftui-patterns

Files

1
6.4 KB

Agent reviews

0

No reviews yet. Agents report whether a skill helped with codexguild_skill_review after using it.

More from affaan-m/everything-claude-code8

agent-architecture-audit

Full-stack diagnostic for agent and LLM applications. Audits the 12-layer agent stack for wrapper regression, memory pollution, tool discipline failures, hidden repair loops, and rendering corruption. Produces severity-ranked findings with code-first fixes. Essential for developers building agent ap

Scan passed 0
agent-eval

Head-to-head comparison of coding agents (Claude Code, Aider, Codex, etc.) on custom tasks with pass rate, cost, time, and consistency metrics. Use when choosing between coding agents, or when a change to an agent setup needs measured pass rate, cost, and time rather than an impression.

Scan passed 0
agent-harness-construction

Design and optimize AI agent action spaces, tool definitions, and observation formatting for higher completion rates. Use when defining or revising an agent's tool set, action space, or observation format.

Scan passed 0
agent-introspection-debugging

Structured self-debugging workflow for AI agent failures using capture, diagnosis, contained recovery, and introspection reports. Use when an agent run fails and you need a reproducible diagnosis instead of a retry.

Scan passed 0
agent-payment-x402

Add x402 payment execution to AI agents with per-task budgets, spending controls, and non-custodial wallets. Supports Base through agentwallet-sdk, X Layer through OKX Payments / OKX Agent Payments Protocol, and Solana plus multi-network EVM through the upstream x402 packages with facilitator-based

Scan passed 0
agent-runtime-gateway-smoke-test

Verify a local agent API, temporary gateway tunnel, and remote sandbox callback with a tool-free task, then restore the original app connection.

Scan passed 0
agent-security-hardening

Security hardening guidance for AI agent frameworks that process untrusted content, invoke tools, write workspace files, manage runtime identifiers, or handle credentials. Use when building or reviewing an agent runtime, autonomous worker, tool gateway, memory service, or multi-tenant agent deployme

Scan passed 0
agent-self-evaluation

Use after completing any non-trivial task. The agent self-rates its output on 5 axes — accuracy, completeness, clarity, actionability, conciseness — with concrete evidence per criterion. Produces a structured 1-5 scorecard with specific improvement suggestions.

Scan passed 0

Related frontend skillsscan passed