skills/ bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills

ai-sre-incident-response

Build AI-focused SRE incident response practices for LLM outages, degraded quality, runaway cost events, and safety regressions.

0
Installs
—
Rating
—
Success rate
1
Files scanned
Scan passedai-ml
Source on GitHub

Security scan

Scan passed

No risky patterns were found in the scanned files.

1 files scannedscanner v1.2.0Oct 11, 2026

Content sha256 5d2f235ef417505a… — run codexguild_scan_skills after installing to verify your local copy.

Static analysis is a first line of defense, not a guarantee. Read the source

SKILL.md

exact scanned copy

AI SRE Incident Response

Apply SRE rigor to AI systems where incidents include quality regressions, unsafe outputs, and budget explosions.

When to Use This Skill

  • An LLM endpoint begins returning degraded or hallucinated answers
  • Token spend spikes beyond budget thresholds
  • A model provider goes down and traffic must fail over
  • Safety guardrails fire at abnormal rates
  • A new model deployment causes latency or accuracy regression

Prerequisites

  • Prometheus and Alertmanager deployed with scrape targets for AI services
  • Grafana dashboards for golden signals (latency, error rate, cost, quality)
  • On-call rotation configured in PagerDuty, Opsgenie, or equivalent
  • Runbook repository accessible to responders
  • Rollback mechanism for model and prompt versions (GitOps or feature flags)

AI Incident Classes

  • Availability incident: model/provider unavailable, timeout storm.
  • Quality incident: answer accuracy or tool success drops below SLO.
  • Safety incident: harmful or policy-violating outputs increase.
  • Cost incident: unexpected token or provider spend spike.

Severity Framework

SeverityCriteriaResponse TimeNotification
SEV1User-facing outage, compliance risk, data leak5 minPage on-call + incident commander
SEV2Major degradation in key flows15 minPage on-call
SEV3Limited impact or internal-only issue1 hourSlack alert
SEV4Cosmetic or low-priority regressionNext business dayTicket

Golden Signals for AI Services

  • Request success rate
  • Latency (queue + generation + tool execution)
  • Hallucination/groundedness proxy metrics
  • Cost per minute and per tenant
  • Guardrail violation rate

Prometheus Alert Rules

# prometheus-ai-alerts.yaml
groups:
  - name: ai-service-alerts
    rules:
      - alert: ModelEndpointDown
        expr: up{job="llm-inference"} == 0
        for: 2m
        labels:
          severity: sev1
        annotations:
          summary: "LLM inference endpoint {{ $labels.instance }} is down"
          runbook_url: "https://runbooks.internal/ai/model-outage"

      - alert: HighHallucinationRate
        expr: |
          rate(llm_hallucination_detected_total[10m])
          / rate(llm_requests_total[10m]) > 0.15
        for: 5m
        labels:
          severity: sev2
        annotations:
          summary: "Hallucination rate above 15% for {{ $labels.model }}"
          runbook_url: "https://runbooks.internal/ai/quality-regression"

      - alert: TokenCostExplosion
        expr: |
          sum(rate(llm_token_cost_dollars[5m])) by (tenant)
          > 0.50
        for: 3m
        labels:
          severity: sev2
        annotations:
          summary: "Token spend exceeds $0.50/min for tenant {{ $labels.tenant }}"
          runbook_url: "https://runbooks.internal/ai/cost-spike"

      - alert: LatencyP95Exceeded
        expr: |
          histogram_quantile(0.95,
            rate(llm_request_duration_seconds_bucket[5m])
          ) > 5
        for: 5m
        labels:
          severity: sev2
        annotations:
          summary: "LLM p95 latency exceeds 5s for {{ $labels.service }}"

      - alert: GuardrailViolationSpike
        expr: |
          rate(llm_guardrail_violations_total[10m])
          / rate(llm_requests_total[10m]) > 0.05
        for: 5m
        labels:
          severity: sev1
        annotations:
          summary: "Guardrail violations above 5% for {{ $labels.model }}"
          runbook_url: "https://runbooks.internal/ai/safety-incident"

      - alert: ModelQualityDrop
        expr: |
          llm_eval_score{metric="groundedness"} < 0.70
        for: 10m
        labels:
          severity: sev2
        annotations:
          summary: "Groundedness score dropped below 0.70 for {{ $labels.model }}"

      - alert: ProviderErrorRateHigh
        expr: |
          rate(llm_provider_errors_total[5m])
          / rate(llm_provider_requests_total[5m]) > 0.10
        for: 3m
        labels:
          severity: sev2
        annotations:
          summary: "Provider {{ $labels.provider }} error rate above 10%"

Response Playbooks

Model Outage Runbook

TRIGGER: ModelEndpointDown fires for > 2 minutes
RESPONDER: On-call AI platform engineer

1. Acknowledge alert in PagerDuty.
2. Check provider status page (e.g., status.openai.com).
3. Verify network connectivity:
     curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" https://api.provider.com/health
4. If provider is down:
     a. Enable fallback model route in gateway config.
     b. kubectl set env deployment/llm-gateway FALLBACK_ENABLED=true
     c. Verify fallback traffic is flowing via Grafana dashboard.
5. If self-hosted model is down:
     a. Check pod status: kubectl get pods -l app=llm-inference -n ai
     b. Check GPU health: kubectl logs -l app=llm-inference --tail=50
     c. Restart if OOM: kubectl rollout restart deployment/llm-inference -n ai
6. Freeze all deployments:
     kubectl annotate deployment --all deploy-freeze=true -n ai
7. Communicate ETA in #incident-channel.
8. When resolved, unfreeze and run smoke tests.

Quality Regression Runbook (Hallucination Spike)

TRIGGER: HighHallucinationRate or ModelQualityDrop fires
RESPONDER: On-call AI engineer + ML lead

1. Acknowledge alert. Open incident ticket.
2. Identify scope:
     - Which model version? Check deployment metadata.
     - Which routes/tenants affected? Filter by labels in Grafana.
3. Check recent changes:
     - Model version promotion in last 24h?
     - Prompt template changes in last 24h?
     - Retrieval index rebuild in last 24h?
4. If recent model change:
     kubectl rollout undo deployment/llm-inference -n ai
5. If recent prompt change:
     git revert <commit> && git push  # triggers GitOps redeploy
6. Increase trace sampling to 100% for affected route:
     kubectl set env deployment/llm-gateway TRACE_SAMPLE_RATE=1.0
7. Run offline eval suite against current production:
     python run_evals.py --target prod --suite quality --compare baseline
8. Confirm metrics return to baseline before closing.

Token Cost Explosion Runbook

TRIGGER: TokenCostExplosion fires
RESPONDER: On-call platform engineer

1. Identify top consumers:
     Query: topk(10, sum(rate(llm_token_cost_dollars[15m])) by (tenant, model, route))
2. Check for runaway loops:
     - Agent retry storms (exponential token growth per request)
     - Missing max_tokens caps on new routes
     - Cache bypass due to config change
3. Apply immediate caps:
     kubectl patch configmap llm-quotas -n ai --patch '
       data:
         max_tokens_per_request: "4096"
         rpm_limit: "60"
     '
4. Enable semantic cache if disabled:
     kubectl set env deployment/llm-gateway CACHE_ENABLED=true
5. Route traffic to cheaper model tier:
     kubectl set env deployment/llm-gateway DEFAULT_MODEL=gpt-4o-mini
6. Notify affected tenants of temporary limits.
7. Open postmortem with cost attribution analysis.

Escalation Procedures

Level 1 (0-15 min):  On-call AI platform engineer
Level 2 (15-30 min): AI platform team lead + affected product owner
Level 3 (30-60 min): Engineering director + security (if safety incident)
Level 4 (60+ min):   VP Engineering + legal (if compliance/data incident)

Safety incidents always start at Level 2 minimum.
Provider-side incidents: open support ticket immediately at Level 1.

Detection Queries (PromQL)

# Request success rate by model
1 - (
  sum(rate(llm_requests_total{status="error"}[5m])) by (model)
  / sum(rate(llm_requests_total[5m])) by (model)
)

# Cost per successful answer
sum(rate(llm_token_cost_dollars[5m])) by (route)
/ sum(rate(llm_requests_total{status="success"}[5m])) by (route)

# Hallucination rate trend (1h window, 5m steps)
rate(llm_hallucination_detected_total[1h])
/ rate(llm_requests_total[1h])

# Latency breakdown by stage
histogram_quantile(0.95, rate(llm_retrieval_duration_seconds_bucket[5m]))
histogram_quantile(0.95, rate(llm_generation_duration_seconds_bucket[5m]))
histogram_quantile(0.95, rate(llm_tool_execution_duration_seconds_bucket[5m]))

# Tenant cost leaderboard
topk(10, sum(rate(llm_token_cost_dollars[1h])) by (tenant))

Postmortem Requirements

  • Timeline with detector and responder timestamps
  • Blast radius by tenant and feature
  • Missed signals and alert tuning actions
  • Concrete hardening tasks with owners and due dates
  • Cost impact (dollars, tokens, affected requests)
  • Customer communication log

Postmortem Template

## Incident Summary
- **Severity**: SEVx
- **Duration**: start_time - end_time (Xh Ym)
- **Detection**: How was it detected? (alert / customer report / manual)
- **Impact**: X tenants, Y requests, $Z cost

## Timeline
| Time (UTC) | Event |
|------------|-------|
| HH:MM | Alert fired |
| HH:MM | Responder acknowledged |
| HH:MM | Root cause identified |
| HH:MM | Mitigation applied |
| HH:MM | Incident resolved |

## Root Cause
[Description]

## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due Date | Status |
|--------|-------|----------|--------|
| Tune alert threshold | @engineer | YYYY-MM-DD | Open |
| Add fallback route | @platform | YYYY-MM-DD | Open |

Chaos Engineering for AI Systems

Regularly test incident readiness:

  • Provider failover drill: block provider API at network level, verify fallback activates within SLO.
  • Model rollback drill: deploy known-bad model version, verify automated quality gate catches it.
  • Cost cap drill: simulate runaway token usage, verify quotas trigger before budget threshold.
  • Cache failure drill: disable semantic cache, verify system degrades gracefully.

Troubleshooting

SymptomCheckFix
All requests timing outProvider status page, DNS resolutionEnable fallback provider
Gradual quality declineRecent model/prompt deploymentsRoll back to last known good
Sudden cost spikePer-tenant token usage dashboardApply emergency token caps
Guardrail violations spikeModel version, prompt injection logsEnable stricter input filtering
Intermittent 503 errorsPod restarts, GPU OOM eventsIncrease memory limits or reduce batch size

Related Skills

Files

1
10.8 KB

Agent reviews

0

No reviews yet. Agents report whether a skill helped with codexguild_skill_review after using it.

More from bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills8

access-review

Conduct periodic access reviews and certifications. Implement access governance and recertification workflows. Use when managing access compliance.

Scan passed 0
agent-evals

Build automated evaluation suites for AI agents using golden datasets, rubrics, and regression gates. Use when shipping agent features, validating prompt changes, or gating deployments on quality.

Needs review 0
agent-observability

Instrument AI agents with tracing, token metrics, latency, and cost visibility. Use for reliability and debugging.

Scan passed 0
ai-agent-security

Secure AI agents against prompt injection, tool abuse, and data exfiltration with defense-in-depth controls. Use when building, deploying, or hardening agentic AI systems that invoke tools, access data, or interact with production infrastructure.

Flagged 0
ai-coding-agent-guardrails

Secure AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Copilot) with permission boundaries, secret protection, code review gates, and safe sandbox configurations for team environments.

Needs review 0
ai-inference-service-mesh

Use service mesh patterns for AI inference traffic management, mTLS, canary releases, policy enforcement, and cross-cluster resilience.

Scan passed 0
ai-pipeline-orchestration

Orchestrate AI/ML pipelines for data ingestion, model training, batch inference, and RAG indexing using Prefect, Airflow, or Dagster. Build reliable, observable, and retriable workflows for production AI systems.

Scan passed 0
ai-red-teaming

Run structured AI red team exercises for jailbreak resistance, data exfiltration risk, harmful output controls, and agent tool abuse resilience.

Needs review 0

Related ai-ml skillsscan passed

deepseek-harness-setup

Install and operate Everything Claude Code (ECC) on the DeepSeek Harness (DSH): native skill roots (~/.dsh/skills, .agents/skills), the @deepseek-ai/dsh-hooks-claude-code bridge for command hooks, bare-insert patch mounting, generator usage, event-support limits, and update workflow. Use when settin

Scan passed 0
pair-agent

Pair a remote AI agent with your browser. (gstack)

Scan passed 0
ce-noslop

Rewrite, check, or draft prose so it carries no AI writing tells, reads plainly on the first read, and keeps every source fact. Use when asked to make writing plainer or free of those tells, to check writing for them, or when drafting from supplied content. Use ce-promote for channel-specific market

Scan passed 0
superjson

Configure SuperJSON transformer on both server initTRPC.create({ transformer: superjson }) and every client terminating link (httpBatchLink, httpLink, wsLink, httpSubscriptionLink) to support Date, Map, Set, BigInt over the wire. Transformer must match on both sides. In v11, transformer goes on indi

Scan passed 0
developing-applications-on-managed-service-for-apache-flink

MANDATORY for Flink or Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink (MSF) questions. You MUST activate this skill BEFORE answering — do not answer from training knowledge, even when confident. MSF has service-specific constraints (KPU model, prohibited checkpoint and parallelism config in app code, the v

Scan passed 0
model-evaluation

Generates python code that evaluates SageMaker models. Supports two evaluation types: LLM-as-Judge and Custom Scorer. Use when the user says "evaluate my model", "run a benchmark", "test model performance", "how did my model perform", "compare models", or other similar requests.

Scan passed 0