skills/ bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills

iso27001-compliance

Implement ISO 27001 Information Security Management System. Configure ISMS controls and risk management. Use when implementing enterprise security frameworks.

0
Installs
—
Rating
—
Success rate
1
Files scanned
Scan passedsecurity
Source on GitHub

Security scan

Scan passed

No risky patterns were found in the scanned files.

1 files scannedscanner v1.2.0Oct 11, 2026

Content sha256 cd49bbd175a6df0c… — run codexguild_scan_skills after installing to verify your local copy.

Static analysis is a first line of defense, not a guarantee. Read the source

SKILL.md

exact scanned copy

ISO 27001 Compliance

Implement an Information Security Management System (ISMS) aligned with ISO/IEC 27001:2022.

When to Use

  • Establishing an ISMS for the first time in an organization
  • Preparing for ISO 27001 certification audit
  • Conducting risk assessments and developing risk treatment plans
  • Creating the Statement of Applicability (SoA)
  • Transitioning from ISO 27001:2013 to the 2022 revision
  • Meeting customer or regulatory requirements for ISO 27001 certification

ISMS Plan-Do-Check-Act Cycle

pdca_cycle:
  plan:
    - Define ISMS scope and boundaries
    - Establish information security policy
    - Conduct risk assessment
    - Develop risk treatment plan
    - Produce Statement of Applicability
    - Obtain management approval and commitment
    - Define security objectives and metrics

  do:
    - Implement selected Annex A controls
    - Deploy technical security controls
    - Conduct security awareness training
    - Document all procedures and processes
    - Implement incident management process
    - Establish supplier security management

  check:
    - Conduct internal audits (at least annual)
    - Perform management review meetings
    - Monitor and measure control effectiveness
    - Review incident trends and near misses
    - Assess compliance with legal requirements
    - Evaluate security metrics against objectives

  act:
    - Address nonconformities with corrective actions
    - Implement continual improvement initiatives
    - Update risk assessment based on changes
    - Refine controls based on audit findings
    - Communicate improvements to stakeholders

ISMS Scope Definition

isms_scope:
  template:
    organization: "Company Name, Ltd."
    scope_statement: |
      The ISMS covers the design, development, operation, and support of
      the Company's cloud-based SaaS platform, including all supporting
      infrastructure, personnel, and processes at the following locations.

    included:
      locations:
        - "Primary office: 123 Main Street, City, Country"
        - "AWS us-east-1 and eu-west-1 regions"
        - "Remote workers accessing corporate systems"
      business_processes:
        - "Software development and deployment"
        - "Cloud infrastructure management"
        - "Customer data processing and storage"
        - "Customer support operations"
        - "Corporate IT and internal systems"
      information_assets:
        - "Customer data (PII, business data)"
        - "Source code and intellectual property"
        - "Employee personal data"
        - "Financial records"
        - "Security configurations and credentials"
      technology:
        - "AWS cloud infrastructure"
        - "SaaS application stack"
        - "Corporate IT systems (Google Workspace, Okta, Jira)"
        - "Development tools (GitHub, CI/CD pipelines)"

    excluded:
      - "Physical data center operations (inherited from AWS)"
      - "Third-party SaaS platforms beyond integration points"
    exclusion_justification: "Physical data center controls are inherited from AWS, which maintains its own ISO 27001 certification."

    interfaces:
      - "Customer API endpoints"
      - "Third-party integrations (payment processor, email provider)"
      - "AWS management plane"

Risk Assessment Process

risk_assessment:
  methodology:
    approach: "Asset-based risk assessment"
    risk_formula: "Risk = Likelihood x Impact"
    scale: "1-5 for both likelihood and impact (total 1-25)"

  likelihood_scale:
    1: "Rare - less than once per 5 years"
    2: "Unlikely - once per 2-5 years"
    3: "Possible - once per 1-2 years"
    4: "Likely - multiple times per year"
    5: "Almost Certain - monthly or more frequent"

  impact_scale:
    1: "Negligible - minimal operational impact, no data loss"
    2: "Minor - limited impact, small data exposure, <$10K cost"
    3: "Moderate - significant impact, data breach <1K records, <$100K cost"
    4: "Major - severe impact, large data breach, <$1M cost, regulatory action"
    5: "Critical - catastrophic, massive breach, >$1M cost, business viability at risk"

  risk_matrix:
    #        Impact: 1    2    3    4    5
    likelihood_5:  [5,  10,  15,  20,  25]
    likelihood_4:  [4,   8,  12,  16,  20]
    likelihood_3:  [3,   6,   9,  12,  15]
    likelihood_2:  [2,   4,   6,   8,  10]
    likelihood_1:  [1,   2,   3,   4,   5]

  risk_appetite:
    accept: "Score 1-4 (low risk, accept with monitoring)"
    mitigate: "Score 5-14 (medium risk, implement controls to reduce)"
    escalate: "Score 15-25 (high/critical risk, immediate action required)"

  treatment_options:
    mitigate: "Implement controls to reduce likelihood or impact"
    transfer: "Insurance or contractual transfer to third party"
    avoid: "Eliminate the risk by removing the activity or asset"
    accept: "Accept with documented management approval"

  example_risk_register:
    - id: "RISK-001"
      asset: "Customer database"
      threat: "SQL injection attack"
      vulnerability: "Insufficient input validation"
      likelihood: 3
      impact: 4
      inherent_risk: 12
      treatment: "mitigate"
      controls: ["A.8.28 Secure coding", "A.8.8 Vulnerability management"]
      residual_likelihood: 1
      residual_impact: 4
      residual_risk: 4
      risk_owner: "CTO"

    - id: "RISK-002"
      asset: "Source code repository"
      threat: "Insider theft of intellectual property"
      vulnerability: "Excessive access permissions"
      likelihood: 2
      impact: 5
      inherent_risk: 10
      treatment: "mitigate"
      controls: ["A.5.15 Access control", "A.8.3 Information access restriction"]
      residual_likelihood: 1
      residual_impact: 5
      residual_risk: 5
      risk_owner: "VP Engineering"

    - id: "RISK-003"
      asset: "Cloud infrastructure"
      threat: "Cloud provider outage"
      vulnerability: "Single-region deployment"
      likelihood: 3
      impact: 3
      inherent_risk: 9
      treatment: "mitigate"
      controls: ["A.5.30 ICT readiness for business continuity", "A.8.14 Redundancy"]
      residual_likelihood: 3
      residual_impact: 2
      residual_risk: 6
      risk_owner: "Head of Infrastructure"

Statement of Applicability (SoA)

# ISO 27001:2022 Annex A Controls - Statement of Applicability
soa_template:
  organizational_controls_5:
    "A.5.1":
      control: "Policies for information security"
      applicable: true
      justification: "Required to establish security governance"
      implementation: "Information security policy approved by CEO, reviewed annually"

    "A.5.2":
      control: "Information security roles and responsibilities"
      applicable: true
      justification: "Required for accountability"
      implementation: "RACI matrix for security responsibilities, CISO appointed"

    "A.5.7":
      control: "Threat intelligence"
      applicable: true
      justification: "Required for proactive threat management"
      implementation: "Subscribe to threat feeds, CVE monitoring, vendor advisories"

    "A.5.15":
      control: "Access control"
      applicable: true
      justification: "Required for data protection"
      implementation: "RBAC via Okta, least-privilege IAM policies, quarterly access reviews"

    "A.5.23":
      control: "Information security for use of cloud services"
      applicable: true
      justification: "Primary infrastructure is cloud-based"
      implementation: "AWS security baseline, CSP shared responsibility documented"

    "A.5.29":
      control: "Information security during disruption"
      applicable: true
      justification: "Business continuity requirement"
      implementation: "BCP/DR plans tested annually, multi-AZ deployment"

    "A.5.30":
      control: "ICT readiness for business continuity"
      applicable: true
      justification: "Ensure technology supports continuity"
      implementation: "DR runbooks, RTO/RPO defined, failover tested quarterly"

  people_controls_6:
    "A.6.1":
      control: "Screening"
      applicable: true
      implementation: "Background checks for all employees before hiring"

    "A.6.3":
      control: "Information security awareness, education and training"
      applicable: true
      implementation: "Annual security training, phishing simulations quarterly"

    "A.6.5":
      control: "Responsibilities after termination or change of employment"
      applicable: true
      implementation: "Offboarding checklist, access revoked within 24 hours"

  physical_controls_7:
    "A.7.1":
      control: "Physical security perimeters"
      applicable: false
      exclusion_justification: "No company-operated data centers, inherited from AWS"

  technology_controls_8:
    "A.8.1":
      control: "User endpoint devices"
      applicable: true
      implementation: "MDM enrollment, disk encryption, screen lock policy"

    "A.8.5":
      control: "Secure authentication"
      applicable: true
      implementation: "MFA required for all systems, SSO via Okta"

    "A.8.8":
      control: "Management of technical vulnerabilities"
      applicable: true
      implementation: "Weekly vulnerability scans, 30-day patch SLA for critical"

    "A.8.9":
      control: "Configuration management"
      applicable: true
      implementation: "Infrastructure as code, AWS Config rules, baseline hardening"

    "A.8.15":
      control: "Logging"
      applicable: true
      implementation: "Centralized logging via CloudWatch + SIEM, 12-month retention"

    "A.8.16":
      control: "Monitoring activities"
      applicable: true
      implementation: "SIEM alerting, 24/7 on-call rotation, anomaly detection"

    "A.8.24":
      control: "Use of cryptography"
      applicable: true
      implementation: "TLS 1.2+, AES-256 at rest, KMS key management"

    "A.8.25":
      control: "Secure development lifecycle"
      applicable: true
      implementation: "SAST/DAST in CI, code review required, dependency scanning"

    "A.8.28":
      control: "Secure coding"
      applicable: true
      implementation: "OWASP guidelines, security code review, automated linting"

Internal Audit Program

internal_audit:
  schedule:
    frequency: "Annual full cycle, quarterly focused audits"
    cycle: "All ISMS clauses and applicable Annex A controls audited over 12 months"

  audit_plan_template:
    audit_id: "IA-2025-Q1"
    scope: "Clauses 4-10, Annex A controls A.5.1-A.5.15"
    auditor: "Internal auditor (independent of audited area)"
    audit_dates: "2025-03-10 to 2025-03-14"
    areas:
      - area: "Access Control (A.5.15)"
        auditee: "IT Security Team"
        evidence_requested:
          - "Access review records from last quarter"
          - "Joiner/mover/leaver process records"
          - "Privileged access management logs"
      - area: "Risk Management (Clause 6.1)"
        auditee: "Risk Management Team"
        evidence_requested:
          - "Current risk register"
          - "Risk assessment methodology document"
          - "Management risk review meeting minutes"

  finding_categories:
    major_nonconformity: "Requirement not met, significant risk to ISMS effectiveness"
    minor_nonconformity: "Requirement partially met, limited risk"
    observation: "Area for improvement, no requirement breach"
    positive_finding: "Notably effective implementation"

  corrective_action:
    major: "Root cause analysis within 10 days, corrective action within 30 days"
    minor: "Corrective action within 60 days"
    observation: "Address in next ISMS review cycle"
    verification: "Auditor verifies corrective action effectiveness"

Management Review Meeting

management_review:
  frequency: "At least annually, recommended quarterly"
  attendees:
    required:
      - "CEO or Managing Director"
      - "CISO or Information Security Manager"
      - "Department heads"
    optional:
      - "Internal auditor"
      - "Risk manager"
      - "External consultant"

  mandatory_inputs:
    - "Status of actions from previous management reviews"
    - "Changes in external and internal issues relevant to the ISMS"
    - "Information security performance (metrics and KPIs)"
    - "Audit results (internal and external)"
    - "Incident trends and nonconformities"
    - "Risk assessment results and risk treatment plan status"
    - "Interested party feedback"
    - "Opportunities for continual improvement"

  mandatory_outputs:
    - "Decisions on continual improvement opportunities"
    - "Decisions on changes needed to the ISMS"
    - "Resource allocation decisions"
    - "Updated risk acceptance decisions"

  kpis_to_report:
    - "Number and severity of security incidents"
    - "Vulnerability remediation SLA compliance"
    - "Security awareness training completion rate"
    - "Access review completion rate"
    - "Audit finding closure rate"
    - "Risk treatment plan progress"
    - "Patch compliance percentage"

ISO 27001 Certification Checklist

certification_checklist:
  stage_1_audit_preparation:
    - [ ] ISMS scope documented and approved
    - [ ] Information security policy published
    - [ ] Risk assessment methodology defined
    - [ ] Risk assessment completed with risk register
    - [ ] Risk treatment plan developed
    - [ ] Statement of Applicability completed
    - [ ] ISMS objectives defined with measurable targets
    - [ ] Internal audit program established
    - [ ] At least one full internal audit completed
    - [ ] Management review conducted with minutes documented
    - [ ] Document control process in place

  stage_2_audit_preparation:
    - [ ] All Annex A controls implemented per SoA
    - [ ] Evidence of control operation for 3+ months
    - [ ] Corrective actions from internal audit tracked and closed
    - [ ] Security awareness training delivered and recorded
    - [ ] Incident management process operational with records
    - [ ] Supplier security assessments performed
    - [ ] Business continuity plan tested
    - [ ] All mandatory documented information available
    - [ ] Employees aware of security policy and their responsibilities

  surveillance_audit_readiness:
    - [ ] All corrective actions from certification audit closed
    - [ ] Continuous internal audit schedule maintained
    - [ ] Management reviews conducted per schedule
    - [ ] Risk register updated with new threats and changes
    - [ ] Metrics demonstrate ISMS effectiveness
    - [ ] Changes to ISMS scope documented

Best Practices

  • Secure visible management commitment with a signed information security policy
  • Define ISMS scope carefully; too broad makes certification expensive, too narrow reduces value
  • Use an asset-based risk assessment approach to ensure comprehensive coverage
  • Maintain the Statement of Applicability as a living document aligned with the risk register
  • Conduct internal audits with auditors independent of the area being audited
  • Hold management review meetings quarterly rather than only annually
  • Integrate ISO 27001 controls into daily operations rather than treating them as a separate compliance exercise
  • Use metrics and KPIs to demonstrate ISMS effectiveness to auditors and management
  • Plan for the 3-year certification cycle: certification audit, then two surveillance audits
  • Start collecting evidence of control operation at least 3 months before the Stage 2 audit

Files

1
15.4 KB

Agent reviews

0

No reviews yet. Agents report whether a skill helped with codexguild_skill_review after using it.

More from bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills8

access-review

Conduct periodic access reviews and certifications. Implement access governance and recertification workflows. Use when managing access compliance.

Scan passed 0
agent-evals

Build automated evaluation suites for AI agents using golden datasets, rubrics, and regression gates. Use when shipping agent features, validating prompt changes, or gating deployments on quality.

Needs review 0
agent-observability

Instrument AI agents with tracing, token metrics, latency, and cost visibility. Use for reliability and debugging.

Scan passed 0
ai-agent-security

Secure AI agents against prompt injection, tool abuse, and data exfiltration with defense-in-depth controls. Use when building, deploying, or hardening agentic AI systems that invoke tools, access data, or interact with production infrastructure.

Flagged 0
ai-coding-agent-guardrails

Secure AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Copilot) with permission boundaries, secret protection, code review gates, and safe sandbox configurations for team environments.

Needs review 0
ai-inference-service-mesh

Use service mesh patterns for AI inference traffic management, mTLS, canary releases, policy enforcement, and cross-cluster resilience.

Scan passed 0
ai-pipeline-orchestration

Orchestrate AI/ML pipelines for data ingestion, model training, batch inference, and RAG indexing using Prefect, Airflow, or Dagster. Build reliable, observable, and retriable workflows for production AI systems.

Scan passed 0
ai-red-teaming

Run structured AI red team exercises for jailbreak resistance, data exfiltration risk, harmful output controls, and agent tool abuse resilience.

Needs review 0

Related security skillsscan passed

django-security

Django security best practices, authentication, authorization, CSRF protection, SQL injection prevention, XSS prevention, and secure deployment configurations. Use when reviewing Django authentication, authorization, input handling, or deployment settings.

Scan passed 0
cso

Security audit: supported static findings; qualified profiles add reproduction and repair candidates. (gstack)

Scan passed 0
claude-security

Claude Security: scan the codebase (the whole repository or a scoped part of it), scan changes (this branch's or a pull request's diff, or one commit), or suggest patches (findings turned into targeted patch files, each verified by a panel of agents, that you apply when you choose). Use when the use

Scan passed 0
client-setup

Create a vanilla tRPC client with createTRPCClient<AppRouter>(), configure link chain with httpBatchLink/httpLink, dynamic headers for auth, transformer on links (not client constructor). Infer types with inferRouterInputs and inferRouterOutputs. AbortController signal support. TRPCClientError typin

Scan passed 0
security-and-hardening

Hardens code against vulnerabilities. Use when auditing an input handler for vulnerabilities, when handling user input, authentication, data storage, or external integrations, or when checking a login flow is safe against the OWASP Top Ten. Use when building any feature that accepts untrusted data,

Scan passed 0
ponytail-audit

Quality audit of a whole repo: bugs, security holes, what breaks under real load, risky code without tests, slow paths, and what to delete, merge or split. Ranked, each finding explained in plain English. One-shot report, changes nothing. Use for "audit this codebase", "review the whole repo", "find

Scan passed 0