skills/ bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills

vendor-management

Implement vendor risk management programs. Assess third-party security and maintain vendor inventory. Use when managing supplier security.

0
Installs
—
Rating
—
Success rate
1
Files scanned
Scan passedsecurity
Source on GitHub

Security scan

Scan passed

No risky patterns were found in the scanned files.

1 files scannedscanner v1.2.0Oct 11, 2026

Content sha256 fc6bd860f3d0ac0f… — run codexguild_scan_skills after installing to verify your local copy.

Static analysis is a first line of defense, not a guarantee. Read the source

SKILL.md

exact scanned copy

Vendor Management

Implement a vendor risk management program covering vendor assessment questionnaires, risk scoring, contract tracking, SLA monitoring, and ongoing oversight for compliance with SOC 2, ISO 27001, and regulatory frameworks.

When to Use

  • Onboarding new vendors that will access company data or systems
  • Conducting annual vendor risk assessments and reassessments
  • Negotiating security requirements in vendor contracts
  • Monitoring vendor SLA compliance and security posture
  • Preparing vendor management evidence for SOC 2 or ISO 27001 audits

Vendor Risk Tiering

vendor_risk_tiers:
  critical:
    criteria:
      - Processes or stores sensitive/regulated data (PII, PHI, PCI)
      - Single point of failure (no alternative vendor)
      - Has privileged access to production systems
      - Handles authentication or security-critical functions
    assessment_requirements:
      - Full security questionnaire (SIG or custom)
      - SOC 2 Type II report review (or equivalent)
      - Penetration test results review
      - On-site or virtual security assessment (optional)
      - Business continuity and DR plan review
    review_frequency: Annual
    contract_requirements:
      - Data processing agreement (DPA)
      - Business associate agreement (BAA) if PHI
      - Security SLA with breach notification timeline
      - Right to audit clause
      - Cyber insurance requirements
    examples:
      - Cloud infrastructure providers (AWS, Azure, GCP)
      - Identity providers (Okta, Azure AD)
      - Payment processors (Stripe, Adyen)
      - Primary database or CRM SaaS

  high:
    criteria:
      - Accesses significant company data (internal or confidential)
      - Integrates with production systems via API
      - Processes customer-facing transactions
      - Substitution would cause significant business disruption
    assessment_requirements:
      - Security questionnaire
      - SOC 2 report review (Type I or Type II)
      - Compliance certifications verified
    review_frequency: Annual
    contract_requirements:
      - Data processing agreement
      - Security requirements appendix
      - Incident notification clause (72 hours)
    examples:
      - Email/marketing platforms (SendGrid, HubSpot)
      - Monitoring and logging SaaS (Datadog, Splunk)
      - CI/CD platforms (GitHub, GitLab)
      - Customer support platforms

  medium:
    criteria:
      - Limited data access (internal data only)
      - Non-production system integration
      - Some business impact if unavailable
    assessment_requirements:
      - Abbreviated security questionnaire
      - Compliance certification verification
    review_frequency: Every 2 years
    contract_requirements:
      - Standard vendor terms with security clause
      - NDA
    examples:
      - Project management tools
      - HR platforms
      - Travel and expense systems

  low:
    criteria:
      - No access to company data
      - No system integration
      - Easily replaceable
    assessment_requirements:
      - Basic due diligence (public info review)
      - Confirm no data sharing
    review_frequency: Every 3 years or on renewal
    contract_requirements:
      - Standard terms
    examples:
      - Office supply vendors
      - Facilities services
      - General consulting (no data access)

Vendor Assessment Questionnaire

security_questionnaire:
  section_1_governance:
    questions:
      - "Do you have a documented information security policy?"
      - "Is there a designated CISO or security lead?"
      - "Do you conduct annual security risk assessments?"
      - "Do you have a security awareness training program?"
      - "What compliance certifications do you hold? (SOC 2, ISO 27001, etc.)"
      - "When was your last external security audit?"
      - "Do you carry cyber liability insurance? What coverage limits?"
    evidence_requested:
      - Information security policy (or summary)
      - SOC 2 Type II report (or bridge letter)
      - ISO 27001 certificate
      - Cyber insurance certificate

  section_2_access_control:
    questions:
      - "How do you manage user access to systems containing our data?"
      - "Is multi-factor authentication enforced for all personnel?"
      - "How frequently do you conduct access reviews?"
      - "What is your process for revoking access upon employee termination?"
      - "Do you support SSO/SAML integration for customer access?"
      - "How do you manage privileged access?"
    evidence_requested:
      - Access management policy
      - MFA configuration documentation
      - Access review records (sample)

  section_3_data_protection:
    questions:
      - "How is our data encrypted at rest?"
      - "How is our data encrypted in transit?"
      - "In which geographic regions is our data stored?"
      - "Do you use sub-processors? If so, provide a list."
      - "What is your data retention policy?"
      - "How is our data isolated from other customers? (multi-tenancy model)"
      - "Can you provide data export in standard formats upon request?"
      - "What is your data destruction process at contract end?"
    evidence_requested:
      - Encryption standards documentation
      - Sub-processor list
      - Data flow diagram showing customer data handling

  section_4_vulnerability_management:
    questions:
      - "How frequently do you perform vulnerability scans?"
      - "How frequently do you conduct penetration tests?"
      - "What is your patch management SLA for critical vulnerabilities?"
      - "Do you have a responsible disclosure or bug bounty program?"
      - "How do you manage vulnerabilities in third-party dependencies?"
    evidence_requested:
      - Penetration test executive summary (last 12 months)
      - Vulnerability management policy
      - Patch management SLA documentation

  section_5_incident_response:
    questions:
      - "Do you have a documented incident response plan?"
      - "What is your breach notification timeline?"
      - "Have you experienced a data breach in the last 3 years?"
      - "How would you notify us in the event of a security incident?"
      - "Do you conduct incident response tabletop exercises?"
    evidence_requested:
      - Incident response plan summary
      - Breach notification procedure

  section_6_business_continuity:
    questions:
      - "Do you have a business continuity plan?"
      - "Do you have a disaster recovery plan?"
      - "What are your RTO and RPO targets?"
      - "How frequently do you test your DR plan?"
      - "What is your uptime SLA?"
      - "Do you have geographic redundancy?"
    evidence_requested:
      - BCP/DR plan summary
      - Uptime SLA documentation
      - Most recent DR test results

  section_7_compliance:
    questions:
      - "Do you process data subject to GDPR, HIPAA, or PCI DSS?"
      - "How do you support our compliance obligations?"
      - "Do you have a Data Processing Agreement (DPA) template?"
      - "How do you handle data subject access requests (DSARs)?"
      - "Are you FedRAMP authorized? If so, at what impact level?"
    evidence_requested:
      - DPA template
      - Compliance certification documentation

Risk Scoring Model

risk_scoring:
  dimensions:
    data_sensitivity:
      weight: 30
      scores:
        1: "No access to company or customer data"
        2: "Access to public or non-sensitive internal data"
        3: "Access to internal confidential data"
        4: "Access to PII or customer financial data"
        5: "Access to regulated data (PHI, PCI, classified)"

    system_access:
      weight: 25
      scores:
        1: "No system access"
        2: "Read-only access to non-production"
        3: "Read/write access to non-production or read-only production"
        4: "Read/write access to production systems"
        5: "Privileged/admin access to production or security systems"

    business_criticality:
      weight: 20
      scores:
        1: "No operational dependency"
        2: "Minor convenience; easily replaced"
        3: "Moderate dependency; replacement in weeks"
        4: "Significant dependency; replacement in months"
        5: "Critical dependency; no viable alternative"

    security_posture:
      weight: 15
      scores:
        5: "No certifications, no formal security program"
        4: "Some security controls but no external validation"
        3: "SOC 2 Type I or equivalent"
        2: "SOC 2 Type II within last 12 months"
        1: "Multiple certifications (SOC 2 + ISO 27001), strong program"

    regulatory_exposure:
      weight: 10
      scores:
        1: "No regulatory requirements"
        2: "General data protection (GDPR basic)"
        3: "Industry-specific (HIPAA, PCI)"
        4: "Government (FedRAMP, ITAR)"
        5: "Multiple stringent regulations"

  calculation:
    formula: "Sum of (dimension_score * dimension_weight) / 100"
    risk_levels:
      low: "Score 1.0 - 2.0"
      medium: "Score 2.1 - 3.0"
      high: "Score 3.1 - 4.0"
      critical: "Score 4.1 - 5.0"

  example:
    vendor: "Payment Processor X"
    data_sensitivity: 5  # PCI data
    system_access: 4     # Production API integration
    business_criticality: 5  # No alternative
    security_posture: 2  # SOC 2 Type II
    regulatory_exposure: 3   # PCI DSS
    score: "(5*30 + 4*25 + 5*20 + 2*15 + 3*10) / 100 = 4.1 -> Critical"

Vendor Registry and Contract Tracking

vendor_registry_schema:
  vendor_info:
    vendor_id: "VND-NNNN"
    vendor_name: ""
    vendor_website: ""
    primary_contact_email: ""
    security_contact_email: ""
    vendor_category: ""  # SaaS, IaaS, Consulting, etc.

  risk_assessment:
    risk_tier: ""  # critical, high, medium, low
    risk_score: 0.0
    last_assessment_date: ""
    next_assessment_date: ""
    assessment_status: ""  # current, due, overdue
    open_findings: 0
    certifications:
      - type: "SOC 2 Type II"
        valid_until: ""
        report_on_file: true
      - type: "ISO 27001"
        valid_until: ""
        certificate_on_file: true

  contract:
    contract_id: ""
    start_date: ""
    end_date: ""
    auto_renewal: true
    cancellation_notice_days: 90
    annual_value: 0
    terms:
      data_processing_agreement: true
      nda: true
      baa: false
      right_to_audit: true
      breach_notification_sla: "72 hours"
      data_return_clause: true
      data_destruction_clause: true
      cyber_insurance_required: true

  data_access:
    data_types: []
    data_classification: ""
    data_location: []
    sub_processors: []

  sla_tracking:
    uptime_sla: "99.9%"
    actual_uptime_last_month: ""
    support_response_sla: ""
    sla_breaches_ytd: 0

  status: ""  # active, under_review, offboarding, inactive
  owner: ""   # Internal team/person responsible

SLA Monitoring

"""
Vendor SLA monitoring - Track uptime and response time commitments.
"""
import requests
from datetime import datetime, timezone


class VendorSLAMonitor:
    def __init__(self, vendors_config):
        self.vendors = vendors_config

    def check_uptime(self, vendor):
        """Check vendor service availability."""
        results = []
        for endpoint in vendor.get("health_endpoints", []):
            try:
                resp = requests.get(
                    endpoint["url"],
                    timeout=endpoint.get("timeout", 10),
                    headers=endpoint.get("headers", {}),
                )
                results.append({
                    "endpoint": endpoint["url"],
                    "status": resp.status_code,
                    "response_time_ms": resp.elapsed.total_seconds() * 1000,
                    "healthy": resp.status_code == endpoint.get("expected_status", 200),
                    "timestamp": datetime.now(timezone.utc).isoformat(),
                })
            except requests.RequestException as e:
                results.append({
                    "endpoint": endpoint["url"],
                    "status": "error",
                    "error": str(e),
                    "healthy": False,
                    "timestamp": datetime.now(timezone.utc).isoformat(),
                })
        return results

    def check_status_page(self, vendor):
        """Check vendor status page for active incidents."""
        status_url = vendor.get("status_page_url")
        if not status_url:
            return None
        try:
            api_url = f"{status_url}/api/v2/summary.json"
            resp = requests.get(api_url, timeout=10)
            data = resp.json()
            return {
                "vendor": vendor["name"],
                "status": data.get("status", {}).get("indicator", "unknown"),
                "active_incidents": len(data.get("incidents", [])),
                "components": [
                    {"name": c["name"], "status": c["status"]}
                    for c in data.get("components", [])
                ],
            }
        except Exception:
            return {"vendor": vendor["name"], "status": "unknown"}

    def generate_sla_report(self, vendor_name, monthly_checks):
        """Calculate monthly SLA compliance."""
        total = len(monthly_checks)
        healthy = sum(1 for c in monthly_checks if c.get("healthy"))
        uptime_pct = (healthy / total * 100) if total > 0 else 0
        avg_response = (
            sum(c.get("response_time_ms", 0) for c in monthly_checks if c.get("healthy"))
            / max(healthy, 1)
        )
        return {
            "vendor": vendor_name,
            "period": datetime.now(timezone.utc).strftime("%Y-%m"),
            "total_checks": total,
            "healthy_checks": healthy,
            "uptime_percentage": round(uptime_pct, 3),
            "avg_response_time_ms": round(avg_response, 1),
            "sla_met": uptime_pct >= 99.9,
        }

Vendor Lifecycle Management

vendor_lifecycle:
  onboarding:
    step_1_request:
      - Business owner submits vendor request with use case
      - Procurement assigns vendor ID
      - Initial risk tier assessment based on data access and criticality

    step_2_assess:
      - Send security questionnaire (appropriate to tier)
      - Review compliance certifications
      - Evaluate questionnaire responses
      - Score vendor risk

    step_3_contract:
      - Negotiate security requirements based on risk tier
      - Execute DPA/BAA as required
      - Document data flows and access scope
      - Set SLA expectations

    step_4_provision:
      - Configure integration with least privilege access
      - Enable audit logging for vendor access
      - Add to vendor registry
      - Schedule first reassessment

  ongoing_management:
    monitoring:
      - Track SLA compliance monthly
      - Monitor vendor status pages for incidents
      - Review vendor security advisories
      - Track data sub-processor changes
    reassessment:
      - Conduct reassessment per tier schedule
      - Review updated SOC 2 / ISO 27001 reports
      - Verify certifications are current
      - Update risk score

  offboarding:
    step_1_plan:
      - Data migration or transition to replacement vendor
      - Identify all integrations and access points
      - Communication plan for stakeholders

    step_2_execute:
      - Revoke all API keys, credentials, and access
      - Request data return or destruction certificate
      - Remove vendor integrations from systems
      - Disable SSO/SAML connections

    step_3_verify:
      - Confirm data destruction (written certification)
      - Verify all access revoked
      - Update vendor registry status to inactive
      - Archive vendor records for retention period

Vendor Management Checklist

vendor_management_checklist:
  program_setup:
    - [ ] Vendor risk tiering criteria defined
    - [ ] Security questionnaire template created
    - [ ] Risk scoring model documented
    - [ ] Vendor registry established
    - [ ] Onboarding and offboarding procedures documented
    - [ ] Contract security requirements defined per tier

  ongoing_operations:
    - [ ] All active vendors cataloged in registry
    - [ ] Risk tier assigned to each vendor
    - [ ] Security assessments current (per tier schedule)
    - [ ] Compliance certifications on file and not expired
    - [ ] DPAs/BAAs signed for all vendors handling personal data
    - [ ] SLA monitoring active for critical and high-tier vendors
    - [ ] Sub-processor lists reviewed and tracked
    - [ ] Vendor security incidents tracked and assessed

  governance:
    - [ ] Vendor management policy approved and published
    - [ ] Roles and responsibilities assigned (owner per vendor)
    - [ ] Assessment findings tracked to remediation
    - [ ] Vendor risk reported to management quarterly
    - [ ] Offboarding includes data destruction verification
    - [ ] Evidence retained for compliance audit (3+ years)

Best Practices

  • Tier vendors by risk before investing assessment effort: not every vendor needs a full security review
  • Use standardized questionnaires (SIG, CAIQ, or consistent custom template) for comparable assessments
  • Review SOC 2 Type II reports thoroughly, including complementary user entity controls
  • Include right-to-audit clauses in contracts for critical vendors even if you do not exercise them frequently
  • Monitor vendor status pages and set up alerts for outages affecting your services
  • Track sub-processor changes: your vendor's vendor is part of your supply chain risk
  • Maintain a vendor registry as a single source of truth for all vendor relationships
  • Conduct offboarding rigorously: revoke all access and obtain data destruction certificates
  • Score vendor risk quantitatively to enable consistent prioritization and trend analysis
  • Report vendor risk metrics to management quarterly as part of the overall risk management program

Files

1
17.8 KB

Agent reviews

0

No reviews yet. Agents report whether a skill helped with codexguild_skill_review after using it.

More from bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills8

access-review

Conduct periodic access reviews and certifications. Implement access governance and recertification workflows. Use when managing access compliance.

Scan passed 0
agent-evals

Build automated evaluation suites for AI agents using golden datasets, rubrics, and regression gates. Use when shipping agent features, validating prompt changes, or gating deployments on quality.

Needs review 0
agent-observability

Instrument AI agents with tracing, token metrics, latency, and cost visibility. Use for reliability and debugging.

Scan passed 0
ai-agent-security

Secure AI agents against prompt injection, tool abuse, and data exfiltration with defense-in-depth controls. Use when building, deploying, or hardening agentic AI systems that invoke tools, access data, or interact with production infrastructure.

Flagged 0
ai-coding-agent-guardrails

Secure AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Copilot) with permission boundaries, secret protection, code review gates, and safe sandbox configurations for team environments.

Needs review 0
ai-inference-service-mesh

Use service mesh patterns for AI inference traffic management, mTLS, canary releases, policy enforcement, and cross-cluster resilience.

Scan passed 0
ai-pipeline-orchestration

Orchestrate AI/ML pipelines for data ingestion, model training, batch inference, and RAG indexing using Prefect, Airflow, or Dagster. Build reliable, observable, and retriable workflows for production AI systems.

Scan passed 0
ai-red-teaming

Run structured AI red team exercises for jailbreak resistance, data exfiltration risk, harmful output controls, and agent tool abuse resilience.

Needs review 0

Related security skillsscan passed

agent-security-hardening

Security hardening guidance for AI agent frameworks that process untrusted content, invoke tools, write workspace files, manage runtime identifiers, or handle credentials. Use when building or reviewing an agent runtime, autonomous worker, tool gateway, memory service, or multi-tenant agent deployme

Scan passed 0
cso

Security audit: supported static findings; qualified profiles add reproduction and repair candidates. (gstack)

Scan passed 0
claude-security

Claude Security: scan the codebase (the whole repository or a scoped part of it), scan changes (this branch's or a pull request's diff, or one commit), or suggest patches (findings turned into targeted patch files, each verified by a panel of agents, that you apply when you choose). Use when the use

Scan passed 0
auth

Implement JWT/cookie authentication and authorization in tRPC using createContext for user extraction, t.middleware with opts.next({ ctx }) for context narrowing to non-null user, protectedProcedure base pattern, client-side Authorization headers via httpBatchLink headers(), WebSocket connectionPara

Scan passed 0
security-and-hardening

Hardens code against vulnerabilities. Use when auditing an input handler for vulnerabilities, when handling user input, authentication, data storage, or external integrations, or when checking a login flow is safe against the OWASP Top Ten. Use when building any feature that accepts untrusted data,

Scan passed 0
ponytail-audit

Quality audit of a whole repo: bugs, security holes, what breaks under real load, risky code without tests, slow paths, and what to delete, merge or split. Ranked, each finding explained in plain English. One-shot report, changes nothing. Use for "audit this codebase", "review the whole repo", "find

Scan passed 0