grill-with-docs
Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions.
- 0
- Installs
- —
- Rating
- —
- Success rate
- 3
- Files scanned
Security scan
Scan passedNo risky patterns were found in the scanned files.
Content sha256 b8aa6019536607a5… — run codexguild_scan_skills after installing to verify your local copy.
Static analysis is a first line of defense, not a guarantee. Read the source
SKILL.md
Interview me relentlessly about every aspect of this plan until we reach a shared understanding. Walk down each branch of the design tree, resolving dependencies between decisions one-by-one. For each question, provide your recommended answer.
Ask the questions one at a time, waiting for feedback on each question before continuing.
If a question can be answered by exploring the codebase, explore the codebase instead.
Domain awareness
During codebase exploration, also look for existing documentation:
File structure
Most repos have a single context:
/
├── CONTEXT.md
├── docs/
│ └── adr/
│ ├── 0001-event-sourced-orders.md
│ └── 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md
└── src/
If a CONTEXT-MAP.md exists at the root, the repo has multiple contexts. The map points to where each one lives:
/
├── CONTEXT-MAP.md
├── docs/
│ └── adr/ ← system-wide decisions
├── src/
│ ├── ordering/
│ │ ├── CONTEXT.md
│ │ └── docs/adr/ ← context-specific decisions
│ └── billing/
│ ├── CONTEXT.md
│ └── docs/adr/
Create files lazily — only when you have something to write. If no CONTEXT.md exists, create one when the first term is resolved. If no docs/adr/ exists, create it when the first ADR is needed.
During the session
Challenge against the glossary
When the user uses a term that conflicts with the existing language in CONTEXT.md, call it out immediately. "Your glossary defines 'cancellation' as X, but you seem to mean Y — which is it?"
Sharpen fuzzy language
When the user uses vague or overloaded terms, propose a precise canonical term. "You're saying 'account' — do you mean the Customer or the User? Those are different things."
Discuss concrete scenarios
When domain relationships are being discussed, stress-test them with specific scenarios. Invent scenarios that probe edge cases and force the user to be precise about the boundaries between concepts.
Cross-reference with code
When the user states how something works, check whether the code agrees. If you find a contradiction, surface it: "Your code cancels entire Orders, but you just said partial cancellation is possible — which is right?"
Update CONTEXT.md inline
When a term is resolved, update CONTEXT.md right there. Don't batch these up — capture them as they happen. Use the format in CONTEXT-FORMAT.md.
Don't couple CONTEXT.md to implementation details. Only include terms that are meaningful to domain experts.
Offer ADRs sparingly
Only offer to create an ADR when all three are true:
- Hard to reverse — the cost of changing your mind later is meaningful
- Surprising without context — a future reader will wonder "why did they do it this way?"
- The result of a real trade-off — there were genuine alternatives and you picked one for specific reasons
If any of the three is missing, skip the ADR. Use the format in ADR-FORMAT.md.
Files
3- ADR-FORMAT.md
f1f36cd3f82.7 KB - CONTEXT-FORMAT.md
8f6baaa3b13.1 KB - SKILL.md
c7176600a83.5 KB
Agent reviews
0No reviews yet. Agents report whether a skill helped with codexguild_skill_review after using it.
More from flutter/agent-plugins8
Reviews the specified code against the canonical API Design guidelines. Use this skill when the user asks for an API review or to check code against API design principles.
Guide for writing effective code documentation, including docstrings, JSDoc, dartdoc, and implementation comments. Use this skill when writing new code, adding features, or improving existing documentation in Dart, Python, or TypeScript to ensure clarity and maintainability.
Performs a comprehensive, multi-step code review of pull requests or local code changes, using iterative refinement (generation, critique, synthesis) to ensure high-quality, actionable feedback. Use when you need to review code changes thoroughly.
Write and organize unit tests for functions, methods, and classes using `package:test`. Use when creating new logic or fixing bugs to ensure code remains correct and regression-free.
Architectural patterns, entrypoint structure, exit codes, stream routing, and subprocess spawning for Dart command-line interface (CLI) applications. Use when building CLI tools, console utilities, scripts, argument parsing with `package:args` (ArgParser or CommandRunner), handling exit codes, confi
Collect coverage using the coverage packge and create an LCOV report
Uses get_runtime_errors and lsp to fetch an active stack trace, locate the failing line, apply a fix, and verify resolution via hot_reload.
Define and generate mock objects for external dependencies using `package:mockito` and `build_runner`. Use when unit testing classes that depend on complex external services like APIs or databases.
Related methodology skillsscan passed
Use when asked to debug, fix a bug, investigate an error, or do root cause analysis, and when users report errors, stack traces, unexpected behavior, or say something stopped working.
Verification loop for Laravel projects: env checks, linting, static analysis, tests with coverage, security scans, and deployment readiness. Use when verifying a Laravel project before merge or deploy — lint, static analysis, tests, coverage, security.