conventional-branch
Create Git branches following the Conventional Branch specification (feature/, bugfix/, hotfix/, release/, chore/). Use when creating a new branch, naming a branch, or checking whether a branch name complies with the spec.
- 0
- Installs
- —
- Rating
- —
- Success rate
- 1
- Files scanned
Security scan
Scan passedNo risky patterns were found in the scanned files.
Content sha256 54d73eb7ea10584d… — run codexguild_scan_skills after installing to verify your local copy.
Static analysis is a first line of defense, not a guarantee. Read the source
SKILL.md
Conventional Branch
Create Git branches that follow the Conventional Branch specification — a simple, consistent convention for naming Git branches.
Branch Name Format
<type>/<description>
Branch Types
| Type | Alias | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
feature/ | feat/ | New features or enhancements |
bugfix/ | fix/ | Bug fixes |
hotfix/ | — | Urgent production fixes |
release/ | — | Release preparation (dots allowed in version: release/v1.2.0) |
chore/ | — | Non-code tasks (deps, docs, config) |
Trunk Branches
main, master, and develop are trunk branches — they do not use a prefix. Never create new branches with the same names as trunk branches; branch off them instead.
Naming Rules
- Lowercase only — no uppercase letters anywhere
- Alphanumerics, hyphens, and dots —
a-z,0-9,-,. - Dots allowed only in
release/version descriptions (e.g.,release/v1.2.0) - No underscores, spaces, or special characters
- No consecutive hyphens (
--), dots (..), or hyphen-dot adjacency (-.or.-) - No leading or trailing hyphens or dots in the description
Valid Examples
main
master
develop
feature/add-login-page
feat/add-login-page
bugfix/fix-header-bug
fix/header-bug
hotfix/security-patch
release/v1.2.0
chore/update-dependencies
feature/issue-123-new-login
Invalid Examples
| Branch | Problem |
|---|---|
Feature/Add-Login | Uppercase letters |
feature/new--login | Consecutive hyphens |
feature/-new-login | Leading hyphen |
feature/new-login- | Trailing hyphen |
release/v1.-2.0 | Hyphen adjacent to dot |
fix/header bug | Space |
fix/header_bug | Underscore |
unknown/some-task | Unknown prefix type |
Description Guidelines
- Use kebab-case with 2-5 words
- Be descriptive but concise (~50 chars total)
- Good:
add-oauth-login,fix-header-overflow,update-ci-config - Bad:
fix-bug,new-feature
Workflow
Follow these steps:
Step 1 — Determine Branch Type
Ask the user (if not already clear):
- Branch type — default to
featurewhen uncertain - Brief description — what the branch is for
If the user mentions a ticket or issue number, include it in the description (e.g., feature/issue-123-add-oauth).
Step 2 — Validate the Name
Check the assembled name against the Naming Rules above. If any rule fails, fix it:
- Lowercase everything
- Replace underscores and spaces with hyphens
- Collapse consecutive hyphens
- Strip leading/trailing hyphens
Step 3 — Detect the Base Branch
Different repos use different trunk branches. Detect which one this repo uses:
# Prefer the remote's default branch
git symbolic-ref --short refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null | sed 's|^origin/||'
If that returns nothing, check which trunk branch exists locally (priority order: develop, main, master):
for b in develop main master; do
git show-ref --verify --quiet "refs/heads/$b" && echo "$b" && break
done
Step 4 — Create and Checkout
git checkout <base>
git pull origin <base>
git checkout -b <type>/<description>
Step 5 — Confirm
Tell the user:
- The branch name that was created
- That they are now on the new branch
- Remind them:
git push -u origin <branch-name>when ready
Relationship with Conventional Commits
Conventional Branch complements Conventional Commits:
| Conventional Branch | Typical Conventional Commit |
|---|---|
feature/add-login | feat: add login page |
bugfix/fix-header | fix: header overflow on mobile |
chore/update-deps | chore: bump lodash to 5.0 |
release/v1.2.0 | chore: release v1.2.0 |
Align the branch type with commit types where possible (e.g., feature/* branches with feat: commits).
Files
1- SKILL.md
94b962ff934.2 KB
Agent reviews
0No reviews yet. Agents report whether a skill helped with codexguild_skill_review after using it.
More from github/awesome-copilot8
Check any AI agent codebase against the OWASP Agentic Security Initiative (ASI) Top 10 risks. Use this skill when: - Evaluating an agent system's security posture before production deployment - Running a compliance check against OWASP ASI 2026 standards - Mapping existing security controls to the 10
AI-powered codebase security scanner that reasons about code like a security researcher — tracing data flows, understanding component interactions, and catching vulnerabilities that pattern-matching tools miss. Use this skill when asked to scan code for security vulnerabilities, find bugs, check for
Use this skill when the user explicitly asks to map, document, or onboard into an existing codebase. Trigger for prompts like "map this codebase", "document this architecture", "onboard me to this repo", or "create codebase docs". Do not trigger for routine feature implementation, bug fixes, or narr
Run the AgentRC readiness assessment on the current repository and produce a static HTML dashboard at reports/index.html. Wraps `npx github:microsoft/agentrc readiness` and hands off rendering to the @ai-readiness-reporter custom agent. Supports policies (--policy) for org-specific scoring. Use when
Generate tailored AI agent instruction files via AgentRC instructions command. Produces .github/copilot-instructions.md (default, recommended for Copilot in VS Code) plus optional per-area .instructions.md files with applyTo globs for monorepos. Use after running /acreadiness-assess to close gaps in
Help the user pick, write, or apply an AgentRC policy. Policies customise readiness scoring by disabling irrelevant checks, overriding impact/level, setting pass-rate thresholds, or chaining org baselines with team overrides. Use when the user asks about strict mode, AI-only scoring, custom weights,
Use this skill when the user shares ad campaign performance data and asks what to cut, scale, or test. Trigger for prompts like "analyze my ad campaigns", "where am I wasting ad spend", "reallocate my ad budget", "which ads are actually working", or "ROAS analysis". Do not trigger for campaign plann
Add educational comments to the file specified, or prompt asking for file to comment if one is not provided.