suggest-awesome-github-copilot-agents
Suggest relevant GitHub Copilot Custom Agents files from the awesome-copilot repository based on current repository context and chat history, avoiding duplicates with existing custom agents in this repository, and identifying outdated agents that need updates.
- 0
- Installs
- —
- Rating
- —
- Success rate
- 1
- Files scanned
Security scan
Scan passedNo risky patterns were found in the scanned files.
Content sha256 d22d20acb2dc84aa… — run codexguild_scan_skills after installing to verify your local copy.
Static analysis is a first line of defense, not a guarantee. Read the source
SKILL.md
Suggest Awesome GitHub Copilot Custom Agents
Analyze current repository context and suggest relevant Custom Agents files from the GitHub awesome-copilot repository that are not already available in this repository. Custom Agent files are located in the agents folder of the awesome-copilot repository.
Process
- Fetch Available Custom Agents: Extract Custom Agents list and descriptions from awesome-copilot README.agents.md. Must use
fetchtool. - Scan Local Custom Agents: Discover existing custom agent files in
.github/agents/folder - Extract Descriptions: Read front matter from local custom agent files to get descriptions
- Fetch Remote Versions: For each local agent, fetch the corresponding version from awesome-copilot repository using raw GitHub URLs (e.g.,
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/github/awesome-copilot/main/agents/<filename>) - Compare Versions: Compare local agent content with remote versions to identify:
- Agents that are up-to-date (exact match)
- Agents that are outdated (content differs)
- Key differences in outdated agents (tools, description, content)
- Analyze Context: Review chat history, repository files, and current project needs
- Match Relevance: Compare available custom agents against identified patterns and requirements
- Present Options: Display relevant custom agents with descriptions, rationale, and availability status including outdated agents
- Validate: Ensure suggested agents would add value not already covered by existing agents
- Output: Provide structured table with suggestions, descriptions, and links to both awesome-copilot custom agents and similar local custom agents AWAIT user request to proceed with installation or updates of specific custom agents. DO NOT INSTALL OR UPDATE UNLESS DIRECTED TO DO SO.
- Download/Update Assets: For requested agents, automatically:
- Download new agents to
.github/agents/folder - Update outdated agents by replacing with latest version from awesome-copilot
- Do NOT adjust content of the files
- Use
#fetchtool to download assets, but may usecurlusing#runInTerminaltool to ensure all content is retrieved - Use
#todostool to track progress
- Download new agents to
Context Analysis Criteria
🔍 Repository Patterns:
- Programming languages used (.cs, .js, .py, etc.)
- Framework indicators (ASP.NET, React, Azure, etc.)
- Project types (web apps, APIs, libraries, tools)
- Documentation needs (README, specs, ADRs)
🗨️ Chat History Context:
- Recent discussions and pain points
- Feature requests or implementation needs
- Code review patterns
- Development workflow requirements
Output Format
Display analysis results in structured table comparing awesome-copilot custom agents with existing repository custom agents:
| Awesome-Copilot Custom Agent | Description | Already Installed | Similar Local Custom Agent | Suggestion Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| amplitude-experiment-implementation.agent.md | This custom agent uses Amplitude's MCP tools to deploy new experiments inside of Amplitude, enabling seamless variant testing capabilities and rollout of product features | ❌ No | None | Would enhance experimentation capabilities within the product |
| launchdarkly-flag-cleanup.agent.md | Feature flag cleanup agent for LaunchDarkly | ✅ Yes | launchdarkly-flag-cleanup.agent.md | Already covered by existing LaunchDarkly custom agents |
| principal-software-engineer.agent.md | Provide principal-level software engineering guidance with focus on engineering excellence, technical leadership, and pragmatic implementation. | ⚠️ Outdated | principal-software-engineer.agent.md | Tools configuration differs: remote uses 'web/fetch' vs local 'fetch' - Update recommended |
Local Agent Discovery Process
- List all
*.agent.mdfiles in.github/agents/directory - For each discovered file, read front matter to extract
description - Build comprehensive inventory of existing agents
- Use this inventory to avoid suggesting duplicates
Version Comparison Process
- For each local agent file, construct the raw GitHub URL to fetch the remote version:
- Pattern:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/github/awesome-copilot/main/agents/<filename>
- Pattern:
- Fetch the remote version using the
fetchtool - Compare entire file content (including front matter, tools array, and body)
- Identify specific differences:
- Front matter changes (description, tools)
- Tools array modifications (added, removed, or renamed tools)
- Content updates (instructions, examples, guidelines)
- Document key differences for outdated agents
- Calculate similarity to determine if update is needed
Requirements
- Use
githubRepotool to get content from awesome-copilot repository agents folder - Scan local file system for existing agents in
.github/agents/directory - Read YAML front matter from local agent files to extract descriptions
- Compare local agents with remote versions to detect outdated agents
- Compare against existing agents in this repository to avoid duplicates
- Focus on gaps in current agent library coverage
- Validate that suggested agents align with repository's purpose and standards
- Provide clear rationale for each suggestion
- Include links to both awesome-copilot agents and similar local agents
- Clearly identify outdated agents with specific differences noted
- Don't provide any additional information or context beyond the table and the analysis
Icons Reference
- ✅ Already installed and up-to-date
- ⚠️ Installed but outdated (update available)
- ❌ Not installed in repo
Update Handling
When outdated agents are identified:
- Include them in the output table with ⚠️ status
- Document specific differences in the "Suggestion Rationale" column
- Provide recommendation to update with key changes noted
- When user requests update, replace entire local file with remote version
- Preserve file location in
.github/agents/directory
Files
1- SKILL.md
cc8ed3c9857.8 KB
Agent reviews
0No reviews yet. Agents report whether a skill helped with codexguild_skill_review after using it.
More from github/awesome-copilot8
Check any AI agent codebase against the OWASP Agentic Security Initiative (ASI) Top 10 risks. Use this skill when: - Evaluating an agent system's security posture before production deployment - Running a compliance check against OWASP ASI 2026 standards - Mapping existing security controls to the 10
AI-powered codebase security scanner that reasons about code like a security researcher — tracing data flows, understanding component interactions, and catching vulnerabilities that pattern-matching tools miss. Use this skill when asked to scan code for security vulnerabilities, find bugs, check for
Use this skill when the user explicitly asks to map, document, or onboard into an existing codebase. Trigger for prompts like "map this codebase", "document this architecture", "onboard me to this repo", or "create codebase docs". Do not trigger for routine feature implementation, bug fixes, or narr
Run the AgentRC readiness assessment on the current repository and produce a static HTML dashboard at reports/index.html. Wraps `npx github:microsoft/agentrc readiness` and hands off rendering to the @ai-readiness-reporter custom agent. Supports policies (--policy) for org-specific scoring. Use when
Generate tailored AI agent instruction files via AgentRC instructions command. Produces .github/copilot-instructions.md (default, recommended for Copilot in VS Code) plus optional per-area .instructions.md files with applyTo globs for monorepos. Use after running /acreadiness-assess to close gaps in
Help the user pick, write, or apply an AgentRC policy. Policies customise readiness scoring by disabling irrelevant checks, overriding impact/level, setting pass-rate thresholds, or chaining org baselines with team overrides. Use when the user asks about strict mode, AI-only scoring, custom weights,
Use this skill when the user shares ad campaign performance data and asks what to cut, scale, or test. Trigger for prompts like "analyze my ad campaigns", "where am I wasting ad spend", "reallocate my ad budget", "which ads are actually working", or "ROAS analysis". Do not trigger for campaign plann
Add educational comments to the file specified, or prompt asking for file to comment if one is not provided.
Related knowledge skillsscan passed
PostHog logs for Java
Stop hook that blocks Claude from finishing until quality checks pass. Detects rationalization patterns (surface text heuristics), stale learning logs (filesystem mtime), and low disk space. Complements self-audit by mechanically enforcing learning capture habits. Use when Claude should be mechanica