debugging-livekit-agents
Drives a live multi-turn conversation with a LiveKit agent running locally, using `lk agent debugger`. Use when the user says "test my agent", "try my agent", "does this work", or "why did it call that tool", after editing an agent to check how it behaves, or when an agent on a speech-to-speech mode
- 0
- Installs
- —
- Rating
- —
- Success rate
- 1
- Files scanned
Security scan
Scan passedNo risky patterns were found in the scanned files.
Content sha256 9a5eedacc9ebe5fa… — run codexguild_scan_skills after installing to verify your local copy.
Static analysis is a first line of defense, not a guarantee. Read the source
SKILL.md
Debugging a LiveKit agent live
lk agent debugger runs the user's agent locally as a background process and lets you drive a
conversation one turn at a time. It's built for coding agents: you play the user, choose each next
line based on the last reply, and inspect what the agent did in between.
By default the session is text: speech is off and nothing goes to a LiveKit room, so each turn is fast. When the bug lives in the audio path, start the session in audio mode instead (see Audio mode).
Before the first use, confirm the command exists and read its help:
lk agent debugger --help
The help is thorough and is the source of truth for subcommands and flags, so this skill doesn't
restate them. If the command is missing, the installed CLI predates it. Tell the user to update
lk and use testing-livekit-agents until then. Don't guess at an older command's shape.
The loop
Start the agent, say user turns, inspect what happened, edit the code, restart, repeat, and stop when you're done. Roughly:
lk agent debugger start
lk agent debugger say "Hi, what can you do?"
lk agent debugger say "Book me a table for two tonight"
lk agent debugger stop
Each say prints everything the agent did in response (tool calls with arguments and results,
handoffs, errors) followed by the reply. Between turns you can look at the agent's chat history, a
live event stream, the process logs, and status; --help lists the subcommands.
Restart after every code edit. A running session keeps the old code, and it's easy to lose time debugging behavior the file no longer has.
Debugging with it
- Read the tool calls as well as the reply. The reply shows what went wrong; the tool call and its arguments usually show why. A wrong argument points to the prompt or the tool description. No call at all usually means the tool description never says when to use it.
- Interleave the logs when a tool misbehaves. An option shows the agent's log lines under the turn they belong to, so a tool's traceback appears right below the sanitized error the user would have heard. That's the quickest way from symptom to cause.
- Check the agent's chat history instead of relying on your memory of the conversation. It records what the LLM saw, including instruction and tool changes across handoffs. When behavior seems impossible, the history usually shows the context isn't what you assumed.
- Reproduce before you fix, then re-run the same turns. Keep the sequence of
saylines that triggered the bug so you can compare before and after. - Drive whole conversations. Most bugs take several turns to show up: details collected early that get lost, a user changing their mind mid-flow, a handoff that drops context. A single turn won't find them.
- Script it if a program is deciding the turns. There's machine-readable output and meaningful
exit codes. Check
--helpfor the current format instead of assuming field names.
Audio mode
Text mode skips STT and TTS, so it can't show a name heard as a different spelling, digits the STT
spells out as words, a turn that ends too early, or anything from a realtime model that only takes
audio. Where the CLI supports it, starting the session with audio (check start --help) speaks
each say with LiveKit Inference TTS into the agent's microphone input, and the agent runs its full
audio pipeline.
- Use it when the symptom is about hearing, or when the agent uses a speech-to-speech model that can't run in text mode. Stay in text mode for logic, prompt, and tool bugs: it's faster, and the transcription noise only gets in the way.
- It needs a LiveKit Cloud project. The spoken turns run on LiveKit Inference, so
lkmust have project credentials. Text mode doesn't need them. - Compare what was heard with what you sent. Each turn shows the agent's transcript of your line, and the sent text when the words differ. That difference is often the whole bug: the agent answered correctly to what it heard.
- Write lines the way a caller would say them. Spell out numbers and codes when testing how the agent handles spoken input, and test both forms if the agent should accept either.
- The mode belongs to the session. Restart keeps it; stop and start again to switch.
- A long silent pause can end a turn early. A turn ends once the agent has answered and stayed quiet for a moment. If the agent pauses for a long time before finishing (for example, a realtime model waiting on a delegated answer), the rest of its reply shows up in the next turn. Check the chat history before concluding the agent never answered.
Audio mode still can't interrupt the agent mid-reply or tell you how the agent sounds. Use
lk agent console or audio simulations for those.
When to use something else
| Situation | Use |
|---|---|
| You want to hear it, or hand the user something to try | lk agent console (mic and speakers, a human at the keyboard) |
| The same failure keeps coming back | A turn-level regression test (testing-livekit-agents) |
| You need whole-conversation outcomes graded at scale | Simulations (running-livekit-simulations) |
| Transcription or endpointing on a turn you're investigating | The debugger in audio mode (above) |
| Interruptions, or speech behavior graded across many conversations | Audio simulations (running-livekit-simulations) |
The debugger is for finding bugs interactively. Once you've found one, write a test for it so a later change can't reintroduce it unnoticed.
Related skills
- Building the agent:
building-livekit-agents - Pinning a found bug as a test:
testing-livekit-agents - Whole-conversation checks:
writing-livekit-scenarios,running-livekit-simulations - Production-only failures (worker processes, providers, shutdown):
operating-livekit-agents - CLI flags and API facts:
reading-livekit-docs
Files
1- SKILL.md
73eb5136cf6.4 KB
Agent reviews
0No reviews yet. Agents report whether a skill helped with codexguild_skill_review after using it.
More from livekit/agent-skills6
Builds voice and chat AI agents with LiveKit Agents and LiveKit Cloud. Use when the user asks to "build a voice agent", "create a LiveKit agent", "add voice AI to my app", "implement handoffs", "structure an agent workflow", "my agent is slow / too chatty", "it says it booked but nothing was saved",
Deploys and operates a LiveKit agent in production: shipping a version to LiveKit Cloud and rolling it back, secrets and configuration, the worker process model and prewarming, safe async inside worker processes, provider timeouts and degradation, graceful shutdown, SDK upgrades, and observability.
Looks up current LiveKit facts (API signatures, CLI flags, config options, model and provider support, SDK changelogs, pricing) from the docs instead of answering from memory. Use whenever a question touches LiveKit specifics: "does LiveKit support X", "what changed in agents 1.8", "what are the arg
Runs LiveKit agent simulations and acts on the results. Use when the user says "run my simulations", "regression test my agent before deploying", "run the scenarios", "use lk agent simulate", "did my agent pass", "why did this scenario fail", "run simulations in CI", "test the audio pipeline", "chec
Writes turn-level tests for a LiveKit agent in the user''s normal test suite: pytest (Python) or Vitest (Node.js). Use when the user asks to "write tests for my agent", "add a test for this tool", "test the handoff", "pin this bug", "why does my agent test fail", or after building or changing agent
Creates and maintains the scenarios a LiveKit agent simulation runs, and wires the agent to consume them. Use when the user asks "what should I test", "generate simulation scenarios", "write scenarios for my agent", "add a scenario for X", "organize my scenario files", "my simulations are flaky", "t
Related methodology skillsscan passed
Quality review of a change: is the logic right, is it safe, does it hold under real load, is risky code tested, is it fast enough, and is every line needed. Reads the connected code, not only the diff. Each finding is explained in plain English. Use for "review this", "code review", "review the last
Idiomatic Rust patterns, ownership, error handling, traits, concurrency, and best practices for building safe, performant applications. Use when writing or reviewing Rust code and ownership, error handling, traits, or concurrency is in question.