Secure Workflow Guide

Purpose

Guides through Trail of Bits' secure development workflow - a 5-step process to enhance smart contract security throughout development.

Use this: On every check-in, before deployment, or when you want a security review

---

The 5-Step Workflow

Covers a security workflow including:

Step 1: Check for Known Security Issues

Run Slither with 70+ built-in detectors to find common vulnerabilities:

• Parse findings by severity
• Explain each issue with file references
• Recommend fixes
• Help triage false positives

Goal: Clean Slither report or documented triages

Step 2: Check Special Features

Detect and validate applicable features:

• Upgradeability: slither-check-upgradeability (17 upgrade risks)
• ERC conformance: slither-check-erc (6 common specs)
• Token integration: Recommend token-integration-analyzer skill
• Security properties: slither-prop for ERC20

Note: Only runs checks that apply to your codebase

Step 3: Visual Security Inspection

Generate 3 security diagrams:

• Inheritance graph: Identify shadowing and C3 linearization issues
• Function summary: Show visibility and access controls
• Variables and authorization: Map who can write to state variables

Review each diagram for security concerns

Step 4: Document Security Properties

Help document critical security properties:

• State machine transitions and invariants
• Access control requirements
• Arithmetic constraints and precision
• External interaction safety
• Standards conformance

Then set up testing:

• Echidna: Property-based fuzzing with invariants
• Manticore: Formal verification with symbolic execution
• Custom Slither checks: Project-specific business logic

Note: Most important activity for security

Step 5: Manual Review Areas

Analyze areas automated tools miss:

• Privacy: On-chain secrets, commit-reveal needs
• Front-running: Slippage protection, ordering risks, MEV
• Cryptography: Weak randomness, signature issues, hash collisions
• DeFi interactions: Oracle manipulation, flash loans, protocol assumptions

Search codebase for these patterns and flag risks

For detailed instructions, commands, and explanations for each step, see WORKFLOW_STEPS.md.

---

How I Work

When invoked, I will:

1. Explore your codebase to understand structure
2. Run Step 1: Slither security scan
3. Detect and run Step 2: Special feature checks (only what applies)
4. Generate Step 3: Visual security diagrams
5. Guide Step 4: Security property documentation
6. Analyze Step 5: Manual review areas
7. Provide action plan: Prioritized fixes and next steps

Adapts based on:

• What tools you have installed
• What's applicable to your project
• Where you are in development

---

Rationalizations (Do Not Skip)

Rationalization	Why It's Wrong	Required Action
"Slither not available, I'll check manually"	Manual checking misses 70+ detector patterns	Install and run Slither, or document why it's blocked
"Can't generate diagrams, I'll describe the architecture"	Descriptions aren't visual - diagrams reveal patterns text misses	Execute slither --print commands, generate actual visual outputs
"No upgrades detected, skip upgradeability checks"	Proxies and upgrades are often implicit or planned	Verify with codebase search before skipping Step 2 checks
"Not a token, skip ERC checks"	Tokens can be integrated without obvious ERC inheritance	Check for token interactions, transfers, balances before skipping
"Can't set up Echidna now, suggesting it for later"	Property-based testing is Step 4, not optional	Document properties now, set up fuzzing infrastructure
"No DeFi interactions, skip oracle/flash loan checks"	DeFi patterns appear in unexpected places (price feeds, external calls)	Complete Step 5 manual review, search codebase for patterns
"This step doesn't apply to my project"	"Not applicable" without verification = missed vulnerabilities	Verify with explicit codebase search before declaring N/A
"I'll provide generic security advice instead of running workflow"	Generic advice isn't actionable, workflow finds specific issues	Execute all 5 steps, generate project-specific findings with file:line references

---

Example Output

When I complete the workflow, you'll get a comprehensive security report covering:

• Step 1: Slither findings with severity, file references, and fix recommendations
• Step 2: Special feature validation results (upgradeability, ERC conformance, etc.)
• Step 3: Visual diagrams analyzing inheritance, functions, and state variable authorization
• Step 4: Documented security properties and testing setup (Echidna/Manticore)
• Step 5: Manual review findings (privacy, front-running, cryptography, DeFi risks)
• Action plan: Critical/high/medium priority tasks with effort estimates
• Workflow checklist: Progress on all 5 steps

For a complete example workflow report, see EXAMPLE_REPORT.md.

---

What You'll Get

Security Report:

• Slither findings with severity and fixes
• Special feature validation results
• Visual diagrams (PNG/PDF)
• Manual review findings

Action Plan:

• Critical issues to fix immediately
• Security properties to document
• Testing to set up (Echidna/Manticore)
• Manual areas to review

Workflow Checklist:

• Clean Slither report
• Special features validated
• Visual inspection complete
• Properties documented
• Manual review done

---

Getting Help

Trail of Bits Resources:

• Office Hours: Every Tuesday (schedule)
• Empire Hacking Slack: #crytic and #ethereum channels

Other Security:

• Remember: Security is about more than smart contracts
• Off-chain security (owner keys, infrastructure) equally critical

---

Ready to Start

Let me know when you're ready and I'll run through the workflow with your codebase!