trailmark-structural
Runs full Trailmark structural analysis by building a graph, running `preanalysis()`, and reporting hotspots, taint, blast radius, privilege boundaries, attack surface, and version-gated Trailmark 0.4+/0.5+ data such as proxy counts, subgraph edges, type/reference summaries, and entrypoint attribute
- 0
- Installs
- —
- Rating
- —
- Success rate
- 2
- Files scanned
Security scan
Scan passedNo risky patterns were found in the scanned files.
Content sha256 2f718640eb461f07… — run codexguild_scan_skills after installing to verify your local copy.
Static analysis is a first line of defense, not a guarantee. Read the source
SKILL.md
Trailmark Structural Analysis
Builds a Trailmark graph and runs engine.preanalysis() to compute all
four pre-analysis passes. The core workflow is v0.2-safe; v0.4-only details
are included only after checking method availability, and newer builds
enrich the same output (0.5.0+ adds an attributes key to attack-surface
entries and proxy.external:* nodes from .trailmark/links.toml) without
any workflow change.
When to Use
- Vivisect Phase 1 needs full structural data (hotspots, taint, blast radius, privilege boundaries)
- Detailed pre-analysis passes for a specific target scope
- Generating complexity and taint data for audit prioritization
- Inspecting proxy/unresolved-call counts, subgraph edges, or type-reference summaries when Trailmark 0.4.0+ is installed
When NOT to Use
- Quick overview only (use
trailmark-summaryinstead) - Ad-hoc code graph queries (use the main
trailmarkskill directly) - Target is a single small file where structural analysis adds no value
Rationalizations to Reject
| Rationalization | Why It's Wrong | Required Action |
|---|---|---|
| "Summary analysis is enough" | Summary skips taint, blast radius, and privilege boundary data | Run full structural analysis when detailed data is needed |
| "One pass is sufficient" | Passes cross-reference each other — taint without blast radius misses critical nodes | Run all four passes |
| "Tool isn't installed, I'll analyze manually" | Manual analysis misses what tooling catches | Report "trailmark is not installed" and return |
| "Empty pass output means the pass failed" | Some passes produce no data for some codebases (e.g., no privilege boundaries) | Return full output regardless |
| "A v0.4 field is always present" | Users may still have Trailmark 0.2.x installed | Probe with hasattr() before querying v0.4-only methods |
Usage
The target directory is passed via the args parameter.
Execution
Step 1: Check that trailmark is available.
trailmark analyze --help 2>/dev/null || \
uv run trailmark analyze --help 2>/dev/null
If neither command works, report "trailmark is not installed"
and return. Do NOT run pip install, uv pip install,
git clone, or any install command. The user must install
trailmark themselves.
Optionally record the version:
trailmark --version 2>/dev/null || uv run trailmark --version 2>/dev/null || true
Do not fail if this command is missing; use API feature probes below.
Step 2: Detect languages with Trailmark's parse API.
python3 - "{args}" <<'PY'
import json
import sys
try:
from trailmark.parse import detect_languages # canonical location since 0.3.x
except ModuleNotFoundError:
# v0.2.x predates trailmark.parse; the same function lives in query.api
from trailmark.query.api import detect_languages
print(json.dumps(detect_languages(sys.argv[1])))
PY
If the import fails, rerun the same snippet with uv run --with trailmark python - "{args}".
If the result is [], report "Trailmark found no supported languages under
target" and return.
Step 3: Run the full structural analysis via QueryEngine.
Run this snippet with python3. If the import fails, rerun the same snippet
under uv run --with trailmark python - "{args}".
python3 - "{args}" <<'PY'
import json
import sys
try:
from trailmark.parse import detect_languages # canonical location since 0.3.x
except ModuleNotFoundError:
# v0.2.x predates trailmark.parse; the same function lives in query.api
from trailmark.query.api import detect_languages
from trailmark.query.api import QueryEngine
target = sys.argv[1]
languages = detect_languages(target)
engine = QueryEngine.from_directory(target, language="auto")
preanalysis = engine.preanalysis()
def summarize_subgraph(name: str, limit: int = 25) -> dict[str, object]:
nodes = engine.subgraph(name)
summary = {
"count": len(nodes),
"sample_ids": [node["id"] for node in nodes[:limit]],
}
if hasattr(engine, "subgraph_edges"):
summary["edge_count"] = len(engine.subgraph_edges(name))
return summary
graph = json.loads(engine.to_json())
nodes = graph.get("nodes", {})
proxy_nodes = [
node_id for node_id, node in nodes.items()
if node.get("kind") == "proxy" or node.get("origin") == "proxy"
]
payload = {
"languages": languages,
"summary": engine.summary(),
"preanalysis": preanalysis,
"attack_surface": engine.attack_surface()[:25],
"hotspots": engine.complexity_hotspots(10)[:25],
"proxy_nodes": proxy_nodes[:25],
"subgraphs": {
name: summarize_subgraph(name)
for name in engine.subgraph_names()
},
}
if hasattr(engine, "type_references"):
payload["type_reference_samples"] = {
node_id: engine.type_references(node_id)[:10]
for node_id in list(nodes)[:25]
}
print(json.dumps(payload, indent=2))
PY
Step 4: Verify the output.
The output should include:
languagessummarypreanalysishotspots(possibly empty)proxy_nodes(empty on v0.2.x or when there are no unresolved calls; on 0.5.0+ may includeproxy.external:*entries declared in.trailmark/links.toml)subgraphswith counts and sample IDs
On Trailmark 0.5.0+, attack_surface entries may carry an attributes
object (e.g. solidity_visibility, solidity_overridden_by). Pass it
through unchanged — downstream consumers use it to rank entrypoints.
Some subgraphs may have zero nodes for some codebases (this is normal). Return the full JSON payload regardless.
Files
2- SKILL.md
7716c9069a6.0 KB - agents/openai.yaml
63b5e1a1a6256 B
Agent reviews
0No reviews yet. Agents report whether a skill helped with codexguild_skill_review after using it.
More from trailofbits/skills8
Builds and runs code under AddressSanitizer to catch buffer overflows, use-after-free, and other memory errors during fuzzing or tests. Covers -fsanitize=address builds, ASAN_OPTIONS, reading the crash report, LeakSanitizer, and the overhead and platform trade-offs. Use when fuzzing C/C++ or Rust th
Sets up and runs AFL++ for multi-core fuzzing of C/C++ projects built with afl-clang-fast or afl-gcc-fast. Covers instrumentation modes, parallel main and secondary campaigns, persistent mode, corpus minimization, and crash triage. Use when scaling fuzzing across cores, fuzzing a mature C/C++ codeba
Audits GitHub Actions workflows for security vulnerabilities in AI agent integrations including Claude Code Action, Gemini CLI, OpenAI Codex, and GitHub AI Inference. Detects attack vectors where attacker-controlled input reaches AI agents running in CI/CD pipelines, including env var intermediary p
Scans Algorand smart contracts for 11 common vulnerabilities including rekeying attacks, unchecked transaction fees, missing field validations, and access control issues. Use when auditing Algorand projects (TEAL/PyTeal).
Sets up and runs Atheris, the coverage-guided Python fuzzer built on libFuzzer. Covers TestOneInput harnesses, FuzzedDataProvider, instrumenting both pure Python and native C extensions, and running under AddressSanitizer. Use when fuzzing a Python package, hunting memory corruption in a Python C ex
Augments Trailmark code graphs with external audit findings from SARIF static analysis results, weAudit annotation files, and version-gated Trailmark 0.4.x binary-analysis graph exports. Maps findings to graph nodes by file and line overlap, creates severity-based subgraphs, and enables cross-refere
Understand a codebase before looking for bugs in it - what each function assumes, what it guarantees, and what it depends on elsewhere. Use when starting an audit, threat model, or architecture review on unfamiliar code, and before any vulnerability-hunting pass.
Prepares codebases for security review using Trail of Bits' checklist. Helps set review goals, runs static analysis tools, increases test coverage, removes dead code, ensures accessibility, and generates documentation (flowcharts, user stories, inline comments). Use when preparing your own codebase
Related knowledge skillsscan passed
Clean fixture tool skill with no forced reads and no mode table.
PostHog logs for Java
Discover and evaluate Laravel packages via LaraPlugins.io MCP. Use when the user wants to find plugins, check package health, or assess Laravel/PHP compatibility.