rust-testing
Rust testing patterns including unit tests, integration tests, async testing, property-based testing, mocking, and coverage. Follows TDD methodology. Use when writing Rust tests — unit, integration, async, property-based, or coverage.
- 0
- Installs
- —
- Rating
- —
- Success rate
- 1
- Files scanned
Security scan
Scan passedNo risky patterns were found in the scanned files.
Content sha256 6443f1c19686397a… — run codexguild_scan_skills after installing to verify your local copy.
Static analysis is a first line of defense, not a guarantee. Read the source
SKILL.md
Rust Testing Patterns
Comprehensive Rust testing patterns for writing reliable, maintainable tests following TDD methodology.
When to Use
- Writing new Rust functions, methods, or traits
- Adding test coverage to existing code
- Creating benchmarks for performance-critical code
- Implementing property-based tests for input validation
- Following TDD workflow in Rust projects
How It Works
- Identify target code — Find the function, trait, or module to test
- Write a test — Use
#[test]in a#[cfg(test)]module, rstest for parameterized tests, or proptest for property-based tests - Mock dependencies — Use mockall to isolate the unit under test
- Run tests (RED) — Verify the test fails with the expected error
- Implement (GREEN) — Write minimal code to pass
- Refactor — Improve while keeping tests green
- Check coverage — Use cargo-llvm-cov, target 80%+
TDD Workflow for Rust
The RED-GREEN-REFACTOR Cycle
RED → Write a failing test first
GREEN → Write minimal code to pass the test
REFACTOR → Improve code while keeping tests green
REPEAT → Continue with next requirement
Step-by-Step TDD in Rust
// RED: Write test first, use todo!() as placeholder
pub fn add(a: i32, b: i32) -> i32 { todo!() }
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
#[test]
fn test_add() { assert_eq!(add(2, 3), 5); }
}
// cargo test → panics at 'not yet implemented'
// GREEN: Replace todo!() with minimal implementation
pub fn add(a: i32, b: i32) -> i32 { a + b }
// cargo test → PASS, then REFACTOR while keeping tests green
Unit Tests
Module-Level Test Organization
// src/user.rs
pub struct User {
pub name: String,
pub email: String,
}
impl User {
pub fn new(name: impl Into<String>, email: impl Into<String>) -> Result<Self, String> {
let email = email.into();
if !email.contains('@') {
return Err(format!("invalid email: {email}"));
}
Ok(Self { name: name.into(), email })
}
pub fn display_name(&self) -> &str {
&self.name
}
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
#[test]
fn creates_user_with_valid_email() {
let user = User::new("Alice", "alice@example.com").unwrap();
assert_eq!(user.display_name(), "Alice");
assert_eq!(user.email, "alice@example.com");
}
#[test]
fn rejects_invalid_email() {
let result = User::new("Bob", "not-an-email");
assert!(result.is_err());
assert!(result.unwrap_err().contains("invalid email"));
}
}
Assertion Macros
assert_eq!(2 + 2, 4); // Equality
assert_ne!(2 + 2, 5); // Inequality
assert!(vec![1, 2, 3].contains(&2)); // Boolean
assert_eq!(value, 42, "expected 42 but got {value}"); // Custom message
assert!((0.1_f64 + 0.2 - 0.3).abs() < f64::EPSILON); // Float comparison
Error and Panic Testing
Testing Result Returns
#[test]
fn parse_returns_error_for_invalid_input() {
let result = parse_config("}{invalid");
assert!(result.is_err());
// Assert specific error variant
let err = result.unwrap_err();
assert!(matches!(err, ConfigError::ParseError(_)));
}
#[test]
fn parse_succeeds_for_valid_input() -> Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
let config = parse_config(r#"{"port": 8080}"#)?;
assert_eq!(config.port, 8080);
Ok(()) // Test fails if any ? returns Err
}
Testing Panics
#[test]
#[should_panic]
fn panics_on_empty_input() {
process(&[]);
}
#[test]
#[should_panic(expected = "index out of bounds")]
fn panics_with_specific_message() {
let v: Vec<i32> = vec![];
let _ = v[0];
}
Integration Tests
File Structure
my_crate/
├── src/
│ └── lib.rs
├── tests/ # Integration tests
│ ├── api_test.rs # Each file is a separate test binary
│ ├── db_test.rs
│ └── common/ # Shared test utilities
│ └── mod.rs
Writing Integration Tests
// tests/api_test.rs
use my_crate::{App, Config};
#[test]
fn full_request_lifecycle() {
let config = Config::test_default();
let app = App::new(config);
let response = app.handle_request("/health");
assert_eq!(response.status, 200);
assert_eq!(response.body, "OK");
}
Async Tests
With Tokio
#[tokio::test]
async fn fetches_data_successfully() {
let client = TestClient::new().await;
let result = client.get("/data").await;
assert!(result.is_ok());
assert_eq!(result.unwrap().items.len(), 3);
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn handles_timeout() {
use std::time::Duration;
let result = tokio::time::timeout(
Duration::from_millis(100),
slow_operation(),
).await;
assert!(result.is_err(), "should have timed out");
}
Test Organization Patterns
Parameterized Tests with rstest
use rstest::{rstest, fixture};
#[rstest]
#[case("hello", 5)]
#[case("", 0)]
#[case("rust", 4)]
fn test_string_length(#[case] input: &str, #[case] expected: usize) {
assert_eq!(input.len(), expected);
}
// Fixtures
#[fixture]
fn test_db() -> TestDb {
TestDb::new_in_memory()
}
#[rstest]
fn test_insert(test_db: TestDb) {
test_db.insert("key", "value");
assert_eq!(test_db.get("key"), Some("value".into()));
}
Test Helpers
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
/// Creates a test user with sensible defaults.
fn make_user(name: &str) -> User {
User::new(name, &format!("{name}@test.com")).unwrap()
}
#[test]
fn user_display() {
let user = make_user("alice");
assert_eq!(user.display_name(), "alice");
}
}
Property-Based Testing with proptest
Basic Property Tests
use proptest::prelude::*;
proptest! {
#[test]
fn encode_decode_roundtrip(input in ".*") {
let encoded = encode(&input);
let decoded = decode(&encoded).unwrap();
assert_eq!(input, decoded);
}
#[test]
fn sort_preserves_length(mut vec in prop::collection::vec(any::<i32>(), 0..100)) {
let original_len = vec.len();
vec.sort();
assert_eq!(vec.len(), original_len);
}
#[test]
fn sort_produces_ordered_output(mut vec in prop::collection::vec(any::<i32>(), 0..100)) {
vec.sort();
for window in vec.windows(2) {
assert!(window[0] <= window[1]);
}
}
}
Custom Strategies
use proptest::prelude::*;
fn valid_email() -> impl Strategy<Value = String> {
("[a-z]{1,10}", "[a-z]{1,5}")
.prop_map(|(user, domain)| format!("{user}@{domain}.com"))
}
proptest! {
#[test]
fn accepts_valid_emails(email in valid_email()) {
assert!(User::new("Test", &email).is_ok());
}
}
Mocking with mockall
Trait-Based Mocking
use mockall::{automock, predicate::eq};
#[automock]
trait UserRepository {
fn find_by_id(&self, id: u64) -> Option<User>;
fn save(&self, user: &User) -> Result<(), StorageError>;
}
#[test]
fn service_returns_user_when_found() {
let mut mock = MockUserRepository::new();
mock.expect_find_by_id()
.with(eq(42))
.times(1)
.returning(|_| Some(User { id: 42, name: "Alice".into() }));
let service = UserService::new(Box::new(mock));
let user = service.get_user(42).unwrap();
assert_eq!(user.name, "Alice");
}
#[test]
fn service_returns_none_when_not_found() {
let mut mock = MockUserRepository::new();
mock.expect_find_by_id()
.returning(|_| None);
let service = UserService::new(Box::new(mock));
assert!(service.get_user(99).is_none());
}
Doc Tests
Executable Documentation
/// Adds two numbers together.
///
/// # Examples
///
/// ```
/// use my_crate::add;
///
/// assert_eq!(add(2, 3), 5);
/// assert_eq!(add(-1, 1), 0);
/// ```
pub fn add(a: i32, b: i32) -> i32 {
a + b
}
/// Parses a config string.
///
/// # Errors
///
/// Returns `Err` if the input is not valid TOML.
///
/// ```no_run
/// use my_crate::parse_config;
///
/// let config = parse_config(r#"port = 8080"#).unwrap();
/// assert_eq!(config.port, 8080);
/// ```
///
/// ```no_run
/// use my_crate::parse_config;
///
/// assert!(parse_config("}{invalid").is_err());
/// ```
pub fn parse_config(input: &str) -> Result<Config, ParseError> {
todo!()
}
Benchmarking with Criterion
# Cargo.toml
[dev-dependencies]
criterion = { version = "0.5", features = ["html_reports"] }
[[bench]]
name = "benchmark"
harness = false
// benches/benchmark.rs
use criterion::{black_box, criterion_group, criterion_main, Criterion};
fn fibonacci(n: u64) -> u64 {
match n {
0 | 1 => n,
_ => fibonacci(n - 1) + fibonacci(n - 2),
}
}
fn bench_fibonacci(c: &mut Criterion) {
c.bench_function("fib 20", |b| b.iter(|| fibonacci(black_box(20))));
}
criterion_group!(benches, bench_fibonacci);
criterion_main!(benches);
Test Coverage
Running Coverage
# Install: cargo install cargo-llvm-cov (or use taiki-e/install-action in CI)
cargo llvm-cov # Summary
cargo llvm-cov --html # HTML report
cargo llvm-cov --lcov > lcov.info # LCOV format for CI
cargo llvm-cov --fail-under-lines 80 # Fail if below threshold
Coverage Targets
| Code Type | Target |
|---|---|
| Critical business logic | 100% |
| Public API | 90%+ |
| General code | 80%+ |
| Generated / FFI bindings | Exclude |
Testing Commands
cargo test # Run all tests
cargo test -- --nocapture # Show println output
cargo test test_name # Run tests matching pattern
cargo test --lib # Unit tests only
cargo test --test api_test # Integration tests only
cargo test --doc # Doc tests only
cargo test --no-fail-fast # Don't stop on first failure
cargo test -- --ignored # Run ignored tests
Best Practices
DO:
- Write tests FIRST (TDD)
- Use
#[cfg(test)]modules for unit tests - Test behavior, not implementation
- Use descriptive test names that explain the scenario
- Prefer
assert_eq!overassert!for better error messages - Use
?in tests that returnResultfor cleaner error output - Keep tests independent — no shared mutable state
DON'T:
- Use
#[should_panic]when you can testResult::is_err()instead - Mock everything — prefer integration tests when feasible
- Ignore flaky tests — fix or quarantine them
- Use
sleep()in tests — use channels, barriers, ortokio::time::pause() - Skip error path testing
CI Integration
# GitHub Actions
test:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable
with:
components: clippy, rustfmt
- name: Check formatting
run: cargo fmt --check
- name: Clippy
run: cargo clippy -- -D warnings
- name: Run tests
run: cargo test
- uses: taiki-e/install-action@cargo-llvm-cov
- name: Coverage
run: cargo llvm-cov --fail-under-lines 80
Remember: Tests are documentation. They show how your code is meant to be used. Write them clearly and keep them up to date.
Files
1- SKILL.md
02a9a40dcc11.5 KB
Agent reviews
0No reviews yet. Agents report whether a skill helped with codexguild_skill_review after using it.
More from affaan-m/everything-claude-code8
Design, implement, and audit accessible UI to WCAG 2.2 Level AA across Web, iOS, and Android — semantic ARIA roles and labels, accessibility traits and hints, focus management, contrast, target size, and screen-reader support. Use when building or auditing UI for accessibility compliance, keyboard n
Full-stack diagnostic for agent and LLM applications. Audits the 12-layer agent stack for wrapper regression, memory pollution, tool discipline failures, hidden repair loops, and rendering corruption. Produces severity-ranked findings with code-first fixes. Essential for developers building agent ap
Head-to-head comparison of coding agents (Claude Code, Aider, Codex, etc.) on custom tasks with pass rate, cost, time, and consistency metrics. Use when choosing between coding agents, or when a change to an agent setup needs measured pass rate, cost, and time rather than an impression.
Design and optimize AI agent action spaces, tool definitions, and observation formatting for higher completion rates. Use when defining or revising an agent's tool set, action space, or observation format.
Structured self-debugging workflow for AI agent failures using capture, diagnosis, contained recovery, and introspection reports. Use when an agent run fails and you need a reproducible diagnosis instead of a retry.
Add x402 payment execution to AI agents with per-task budgets, spending controls, and non-custodial wallets. Supports Base through agentwallet-sdk, X Layer through OKX Payments / OKX Agent Payments Protocol, and Solana plus multi-network EVM through the upstream x402 packages with facilitator-based
Verify a local agent API, temporary gateway tunnel, and remote sandbox callback with a tool-free task, then restore the original app connection.
Security hardening guidance for AI agent frameworks that process untrusted content, invoke tools, write workspace files, manage runtime identifiers, or handle credentials. Use when building or reviewing an agent runtime, autonomous worker, tool gateway, memory service, or multi-tenant agent deployme
Related methodology skillsscan passed
Use when asked to review a plan, challenge a proposal, run a CEO review, poke holes in an approach, think bigger about scope, or decide whether to expand or reduce the plan.
This skill should be used when the user wants to "create a skill", "add a skill to plugin", "write a new skill", "improve skill description", "organize skill content", or needs guidance on skill structure, progressive disclosure, or skill development best practices for Claude Code plugins.
Reviews a branch, pull request or uncommitted change for the interface problems it introduced or regressed, across accessibility, layout, writing, typography, color and UI.
Guides Stripe integration decisions across development and test environment planning (separate sandboxes vs the shared test mode sandbox), API selection (Checkout Sessions vs PaymentIntents), Connect platform setup (Accounts v2, controller properties), billing/subscriptions, tax and registrations (S
Cloudflare Workers best practices for production applications. Use when writing, reviewing, or configuring Workers.
Generate and evaluate grounded ideas. Use when the user wants ideas, improvements, or surprising directions before choosing one to develop. Not for refining an idea they already have (ce-brainstorm) or judging one already on the table (ce-pov).